Search blog.co.uk

  • RESULT - Establishment's Woolf Caged

    Child abuse inquiry chair Fiona Woolf RESIGNS after victims unanimously call for her to quit over links to alleged paedo Lord Brittan

    Thw Whitewash manufacturers and Tarpaulin merchants of the Establishment cover - up industry suffered a second blow in their quest to install one of their own as chair of an inquiry into alleged paedophiles operaying in the Palace Of Westminster when Lord Mayor Of London Fiona Woolf stepped down today in response to pressure from abuse victims and support groups along with some media organisations.

    Fiona Woolf told the Home Secretary that she did not have the confidence of the victims and needed to step aside for the sake of the inquiry.

    She said: ‘I did not think it was going to be possible for me to chair it without everybody’s support.”

    RELATED POSTS:
    What Happened To Battling Barbara's VIP Paedophile Dossier
    Paedo Loving Comrade Harperson In Trouble Again
    Child Abuse Scandal - Rochdale
    Child Abuse Scandal - Rotherham

    A few months ago Lady Butler Sloss, a senior judge whose brother Sir Michael Havers was Attorney General when the first cover up, involving a dossier of the sex abuse allegations compiled by former Backburn MP 'Battling' Barbara Castle was lost after being haded to Brittan when he was Home Secretary.

    There is no suggestion Havers was involved in the sex crimes, but he abused his position in order to protect other establishment figures so an impartial inquiry is likely to destroy what's left of his reputation. Lady Butler - Sloss should have declared a conflict of interest and declined the role from the outset as should Finona Woolf who as a personal friend of Leon Brittan could not possibly have been an impartial figure in a case likely to result in the destruction of both his political and personal reputation.

  • Marking time to the end of the world

    Just having a few quiet days as I have a lot on and none of my substitutes are available to fill in. One story noticed on my trawl through today's papers is worth recording here:

    From The Daily Express


    Universe is being SWALLOWED UP by dark energy leaving 'big, empty' space, says shock study

    Scientists have claimed that the universe could become a void of nothingness, as the dark matter of which the universe is built on is slowly being erased by dark energy.

    The shocking report, published in the journal Physical Review Letters, showed that dark energy grows as it interacts with dark matter.

    As the dark energy grows, it slows down the growth of structure in our atmosphere - meaning that we could be left with a universe with almost nothing in it.

    Professor David Wands, director of Portsmouth's Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, said: "This study is about the fundamental properties of space-time.

    "On a cosmic scale, this is about our universe and its fate.

    "If the dark energy is growing and dark matter is evaporating we will end up with a big, empty, boring universe with almost nothing in it.

    "Dark matter provides a framework for structures to grow in the universe. The galaxies we see are built on that scaffolding and what we are seeing here, in these findings, suggests that dark matter is evaporating, slowing that growth of structure."

    Prof Wands said the traditional study of cosmology was thrown upside down in 1998, when researchers announced that the rate at which the universe was expanding was speeding up.

    Read all ...

    This is very scary until you realise that nobody has ever or can ever prove the existence of either dark matter or dark energy. Like so much of what is passed off as science today, both are just the results of mathematical speculations. If you ask for hard evidence that, for example, dark matter exists the answer will be, "Well it has to exist or all our equations that prove Big Bang happened and the universe is expanding fall apart."

    In other words they had to invent darn matter to cover up the fact that most of their theories do not stand up to scrutiny.

    Just how does one get these jobs where you get paid for talking bollocks and never have to do any work?

  • And how many years have passed since we accidentally named Brittan as the alleged parliamentary paedophile

    At last somebody has had the courage to mention names. The name of former future Prime Minister Leon Brittan, which Boggart Blog let slip in 2007, has been associated officially with sex abuse allegations that have circulated for over twenty years. At the height of his success Brittan suddenly quit as Home Secretary after being strongly tipped to succeed Margaret Thatcher, to take up a sinecure as an EU commissioner. His name has been linked with paedophilia allegations since the 1980s.

    Now, as the establishment tries to close ranks around their own once again, appointing a friend of Brittan to head an inquiry into previous cover ups by senior figures in government of allegations that several Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem MPs were involved in a child abuse ring, somebody has at last had the courage to say the name at the centre of it.

    A Labour MP has used parliamentary privilege to accuse former Home Secretary Leon Brittan of ‘improper conduct with children’.

    He used a Commons debate on the 1984-85 miners’ strike to suggest that those who took part in the industrial action will not be surprised by the allegations against Lord Brittan.

    The remarks from Jim Hood, who said there were ‘reports about child abuse being linked with’ the Conservative politician, were criticised as ‘disgusting’ by business minister Matthew Hancock.

    Under parliamentary privilege, MPs can make contentious allegations without fear of prosecution for slander or contempt of court. But critics said Mr Hood’s comments were an abuse of this privilege.

    The row comes amid calls for the head of the official inquiry into historic child sex abuse to resign over links to Lord Brittan, now 75. Fiona Woolf has admitted attending dinner parties with the politician, who was in charge of the Home Office in the 1980s.

    It has been claimed that Lord Brittan was handed a file, which is now missing, in late 1983 which allegedly detailed child abuse at the highest levels of Westminster.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2811776/Labour-MP-links-Leon-Brittan-80s-child-abuse-claims-Amid-row-historic-sex-crimes-inquiry-former-Home-Secretary-named-Commons.html#ixzz3HZChcsvs

    Ssssh! What's that we hear? Could it be the sound of a heavily built man wearing hush puppies running for the hills.

    Strangely, as news broke today of a damning report on the failure of Manhester's Labour controlled council and highly politicised police force to act on allegations of organised sexual abuse of young girls, I have yet to hear one single voice from the left raised in protest about these shameful cases of what amounts to criminal negligence by Labour run councils and their officers. Foucking hypocrites.

  • Proof GCHQ are pants

    Those of us who were involved in the telecomms and certain branches of the computer industry have always known it of course. The whole purpose of the internet and the world wide web was to spy on us. Do you think it was coincidence that an unknown company headed by a college dropout with no work experience in either business or technology but who happened to be the son of a senior boss of America's CIA was handed the project to provide an operating system for the PC destined to be promoted as the defacto standard for personal computers.

    The march towards total surveillance has been under way for a long time. Search up Project Echelon if you do not believe me.

    Only one thing protects our privacy now, and that is the incompetence of the public servants in MI5, the CIA, the NSA and GCHQ. They're morons.

    The NSA allowed a geek like Ed Snowden to walk out with millions of sensitive and embarrassing documents encrypted on a memory stick. And GCHQ, whell they're just pants as this story from 4bit news proves.

    Govt watchdog rejects evidence of GCHQ human rights breeches

    For the benefit of people slow to see the joke, that headline should read
    "breaches". These (below) are riding breeches.

  • The Best Man For The Job?

    I loved this headline and sub headline I saw in The Daily Telegraph today.

    Voters want conviction – Labour has given them European fudge

    As Britain moves closer to leaving the EU, Ed Miliband must lead the fight to remain.

    I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Personality (when God made Ed, he missed a personality) Miliband leading the campaign to keep us in the European Union, we'll be out of Europe in no time and have an extra £55 million a day (yes that's how much we pay now for the privilege of having those EU bastards in Brussels rob us,) to spend on important things like reducing the deficit.

    And if we were to stop fighting America's wars too .....

  • Tony Benn's inheritance tax dodge - another leftie hyocrite exposed

    Pipe smoking, tax dodging Marxist Tony Benn

    Remember the patron saint of loony lefties, Saint Anthony of Wedgewood - Benn, previously known as Viscount Stansgate? Agreeable sort of bloke, pip smokers, great speaker, utterly daft opinions as one would expect from an aristocrat who is so deluded he thinks he understands the working class?

    Got him now? ................. Yeah, he was the one who was ever so keen on redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor, evertbody's wealth ...................except his own it turns out.

    One think all lefties have in common is their hypocrisy, or if you are one of those people who thinks psychobabble is intelligent, their cognitive dissonance.

    You see for all his screeching about how the evil rich should be taxed to penury and legal tax avoidance techniques should be criminalized with the death penalty automatically imposed on anyone guilty of being accused, Benn was no slouch when it came to protecting his own modest fortune from the taxman.

    Not that I would blame anyone for using legal means to minimise their tax liability, its the hypocrisy of the wealthy Labour supporters I can't stand.

    from Yahoo finance:

    A stalwart of the left, Tony Benn was a critic of tax avoidance measures. As an owner of expensive properties in London and the south of England, it seemed inevitable after his death in March that his family would face a hefty inheritance tax bill.

    But now publication of the details of his will coupled with records held by the Land Registry suggests he took practical steps more than a decade ago to reduce the impact of this tax on his heirs.

    After the death of his wife in 2000 , the couple's children appear to have taken on part ownership of the family home, a valuable property in Holland Park, west London. This suggests that some planning had taken place to ensure the children inherited directly from their mother, as opposed to the more normal course of events where the first spouse to die leaves everything to the other, who in turn bequeaths everything to the children on his or her own death.

    This latter course is especially the norm when the surviving spouse continues to live on in the property. Mr Benn sold the house only in 2011.

    How did the transfer of ownership cut the family's tax bill?

    Assuming the couple owned their assets in equal parts, by giving away her share of the property straight to her children or other heirs, rather than her husband, Mrs Benn would make use of her own, personal tax threshold. In 2000 this was £234,000 per person (today it is £325,000).

    If she had simply bequeathed her share to her husband no tax would have been payable by him, as assets passing between married couples are exempt. But, crucially, he would have had more assets to bequeath to his children at his own future death and the benefit of his wife's personal IHT allowance would have been lost. More tax in total would have been paid.

    Read full article and read how you too can dodge death tax legally:

    RELATED POSTS:
    The Lefts's imagined monopoly on goodness and justice
    The socialist Nazi's of The Left
    Do the political left think they are immune to bigotry
    The ruling principles of the political left, hate and hypocrisy
    A liberal's dilemas or how you defend ethnic minority paedophiles
    Is it lack of diversity that makes lefties such bigots/
    Politically Correct menu

  • Comedy And Political Campaigning Do Not Mix

    Mock-the-Week-mock-the-week-3201622-480-320-crop
    Ageing, fat, bald, ex - standups and a token woman

    A stand up comedian of whom I had never heard has managed to grab the kind of attention his comedy has never earned him by having a go at the facile, left wing biased so-called comedy output of the BBC (Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation). All I learned from his rant is that should I ever have the opportunity it is not worth paying good money to see him (far better spending your dosh to see our colleague Janey Godley should she be in your area.

    Andrew does have a point however, even if his post was motivated by professional envy rather than frustration with the way 'ageing, balding, fat men,' who have forgotten how to be funny but still manage to make a nice living out of us poor TV licence payers by fronting BBC shows that broadcast scripted left wing propaganda which is passed off as comedy(and I include the likes of Eddie Izzard, Lenny Henry, Ben Elton, Stephen Fry, Alan Davies and Vic Reeves along with the quasi-game-show panelists mentioned by Lawrence.)

    Look guys, if you can't be funny, fuck off and open a tea shoppe in Hastings, you smug, precious, self adoring, boring old farts. Comedy isn't partisan when it goes political, the moment you start attacking one side and giving the other an easy ride you are dead.

    Yes UKIP are funny, so are The Conservatives, Labour and The Lib Dems (especially the Lib Dems.) They're all fair game. Once you take sides you are lost as far as broad comic appeal goes. Oh you''l always get a laugh out of lefties by saying "UKIP are evil racist bastards", but it isn't really comedy is it, and if you object to people talking about the paedophile loving Labour Party you are not joking, you are campaigning.

    I'm not complaining, every time some fat, smug, self righteous twat on a BBC panel show says "UKIP are crap because they appeal to the working class," its a few hundred more votes in the bag for the only hope we have of smashing the corrupt, self serving political establishment.

    That fine actor Simon Callow summed up what's wrong with the attitude of the new elitist left, during the debate about gay marriage someone asked him on TV did he object to homophobic remarks in comedy.

    His reply was that comedy must not be censored, everything is fair game. He went on to describe himself as a short, fat, balding queer and said all that may be made fun of. It only becomes offensive when people suggest he should be excluded and marginalised for his sexuality.

    The left may scream about equality and respecting diversity but until they learn to respect the right of people who disagree with them to express opinions they are never going to win back the working class. Which is a good thing because the bastards hate the working class.

    Here is the Facebook rant by Andrew Lawrence that sparked the controversy

    Can't help but notice increasingly, a lot 'political' comedians cracking cheap and easy gags about UKIP, to the extent that it's got hack, boring and lazy very quickly.

    Particularly too much moronic, liberal back-slapping on panel shows like Mock The Week where aging, balding, fat men, ethnic comedians and women-posing-as-comedians, sit congratulating themselves on how enlightened they are about the fact that UKIP are ridiculous and pathetic.

    Yet the Clacton by-election victory and what looks to be a likely victory in the Rochester by-election goes to show that UKIP have their supporters.

    Out of touch, smug, superannuated, overpaid TV comics with their cosy lives in their west-London ivory towers taking a supercilious, moralising tone, pandering to the ever-creeping militant political correctness of the BBC with their frankly surreal diversity targets.

    The reason UKIP have resonated with voters is because all the other parties are too spineless to tackle the issue of immigration.

    Our elected representatives seeded control of the borders of this country to the EU and it's been catastrophic for us all, an unmitigated disaster. Nothing works. Public transport infrastructure is dysfunctional. Hospitals and Schools are dysfunctional. The housing crisis continues to blight our economic potential and destroy the hopes and dreams of a generation. The benefits system is totally out of control. All because there are far,far too many people living here.

    For every wonderful, welcome skilled worker our open borders bring into this country, there are also benefit tourists and criminals. For every person that comes here and contributes richly to our culture, there are those that refuse to assimilate, which breeds distrust and has led to a fractured, broken society, where people have lost all sense of community.

    Can't say that I'm a UKIP supporter, but I can see why other people are, and I don't disrespect them for it.

    What I don't respect is lazy comedians, who market themselves as 'political' but rather than having the courage of their own convictions jump on the militant liberal bandwagon- which has been the source of so much shit stand-up over the years- so that they can get TV work and line their own pockets.

    There is a deeply ingrained militant liberal politics at every level of the BBC, despite the fact that it's tax-payer funded and supposed to be neutral. It's a biased organisation and the only sorts of political comedians that are welcome within its corridors are those that reflect it's values.

    Essentially when we're watching these 'political' comedians cracking their piss-poor UKIP gags on the BBC, I think we need to be aware they are neither engaged nor passionate about their subject- but money-grubbing charlatans, toadying up to the militant liberals that pay their wages, mirroring their own beliefs back at them in an act of false flattery so that they'll feel smug and validated and keep them on the BBC tax-payer funded gravy-train.

    I'm not a political comic, my only ambition for my comedy is to make a room full of people laugh. But there are those that disingenuously market themselves as political comics, not out of any genuine conviction, but in an effort to line their own pockets, and I don't like their hypocrisy.

  • BBC - National Treasure To Police State Thugs

    Yesterday I blogged about the BBC and the nasty, evil suveillance tactics those radib Stalinists are using to track down licence dodger. Now British people will know the Television Licence has become the most pernicious and hated tax levied since Wat Tyler and his lads were forced to take up pitchforks and cudgels and march on London in protest at the poll tax. The switch from being a well loved national treasure happened since the BBC ceased to be a publicly funded television channel whose Royal Charter insisted it be politically impartial and instead became a branch of the Labour Party public relations office.

    Apart from a few deluded lefties who would support the internment in gulags mental hospitals of anyone who disagrees with the cultural Marxism agenda and who try to insist the BBC is run by the Conservative Party (left wing paranoia is almost as funny as left wing out-of-touch-with-realityism),everyone knew the BBC had been using police state tactics of lying, threats and imposing draconian punishments on licence dodgers for years. I covered the big lie of the Television Detector Vans and their 'secret technology' yesterday.

    Serendiptitiously the topic came up in a comment thread on an entirely unrelated article this morning. I have posted an extract from the comments covering the relevant points below, You can see the original article here:

    The problem with Owen Jones...

    BRETBART COMMENT THREAD:

    Avatar (THIS LINK TAKES YOU TO THE FIRST COMMENT IN THE SUB THREAD, OTHERS FOLLOW IT)
    Axiom • 4 hours ago

    I don't really know who this Jones his, but if he is famous for appearing on the BBC's political programmes I wouldn't. I stopped watching any BBC political programme as the bias is so great to the left I burst a blood vessel in frustration. The sooner the BBC licence fee is scrapped the better.

    77

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Will Axiom • 4 hours ago

    BBC Licence fee you say? What's that?
    26

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Ripsnorter Will • 2 hours ago

    Come here, Will my lad, make yourself comfortable on great granddad's knee, don't worry, we'll leave the door open so great grandnan can still see us, and I'll tell you about something from long, long, long ago when I was your age, it was called the BBC Licence Fee...
    5

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Will Ripsnorter • 2 hours ago

    Grandad, did they really have magic vans that could pinpoint your location and determine whether or not you were watching telly?
    4

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Catweazle666 Will • an hour ago

    "Grandad, did they really have magic vans..."

    No.

    They had dummy vans with false aerials on the roof that they used to con the credulous, and when they finally managed to obtain some that could pick up the scan frequency of the CRT coils they were not particularly accurate and arrived just in time to be thwarted by the new flat panel TVs which didn't have CRTs.
    9

    Reply

    Share ›

    Only an authority loving, bourgeois middle class leftie could be unaware that the BBC admitted some time back they had been lying about the detector vans and the 'secret technology' was a bloke with a clipboard, a biro and a database report printout.

  • Facebook pays zero tax again as government announces clampdown on benefit fraud

    Daily Stirrer finance expert looks at the latest tax avoidance scandal involving a billion dollar turnover corporation getting a free pass and a handout from the taxman on the same day as The Department Of Work and Pensions announces another crackdown on benefit fraud.

    He wonders why the governments financial agencies are always to eager to go after small time tax avoidance (which is not actually illegal) and benefit fraud and yet year after year turn a blind eye to the blatant criminality of global corporations in their tax evasion techniques.

    Corporate plundering of the UK purse has to stop – Facebook pays zero tax again

  • Big Brother Is Right Behind You And He Knows What you Are Up To

    Big Brother Is Right Behind You And He Knows What you Are Up TO

    No doubt the smug complacent bourgeois fools will shout conspiracy theirist and the emotionally needy leftist Sheeple will bleat "racist bigot" (they always bleat "racist bigot") but it is not alarmist to say the UK is slowly becoming a totalitarian state resembling the one in George Orwell's novel 1984. What else can we call our nation if anti - terror laws are being used prosecute people for low-level offences such as Television licence dodging.

    The BBC (yes, Auntie Beeb)which as we all must be aware is run by a bunch of greedy, self serving, authoritarian Bolsheviks is using laws designed to catch terrorists and organised crime gangs to track down people who dodge the licence fee, according to a Daily Mail report based on a post at the BigBrotherWatch web site.

    The publicly owned broadcaster is using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), designed by the last Labour government to fight terrorism, to catch those who evade paying the £145.50 fee. You may remember that the BBC's claims to possess technology which their said could see into your home and monitor which TV channel you were watching was actually a lie (of course it was a lie, they're lefties, they despise the truth.)

    In 2012, Big Brother Watch discovered 345 councils had been authorised to use RIPA 9,607 times in just three years – the equivalent of around nine spying missions a day.

    Seven public authorities, including the BBC, refused under the Freedom of Information Act to disclose why or how often they had used the powers. The most common use of the legislation is to demand phone companies hand over an individual's communications data.

    At the time, the BBC said the reason for its secrecy was 'to ensure people without a valid TV licence don't use this information to their advantage'. Last night a BBC spokesman said: 'Legislation explicitly grants the BBC the right to use these powers to detect unlicensed use of television receivers.

    'We're regularly inspected by independent regulators and have always been open about using this power when there is no other option to help reduce evasion on behalf of the vast majority of the population who pay for their licence.'

    RIPA, passed by Labour in 2000 ostensibly as an anti-terror measure, gives public authorities sweeping powers to snoop on the public.

    The most common use of the legislation is to demand phone companies hand over an individual's communications data. This would include details of who a person called, when and for how long. However, the act can also be used to mount undercover surveillance operations – such as secretly following a person to see when they are at home. This could, in theory, be used to match the times when a TV is believed to have been in use.

    The Metropolitan Police Force is also in trouble for abusing the powers to gain access the phone logs of reporters on two newspapers in order to trace their sources.

    What is most striking about these events are that publicly funded bodies such as the BBC, the Police and local authorities are refusing to answer perfectly reasonable Freedom of Information Act requests whilst exercising powers they shouldn't have granted by government bodies that voters do not approve of. There is proof that local authorities have used terror laws to surveil dog fouling and even people breaking smoking bans. And, where is all the data being stored of people being caught by anti-terror laws? Where will this end up? Big Brother is watching.

    RELATED POSTS:

    Surveillance, the tool of the totalitarian state
    Surveillance will be total soon
    The rise of the authoritarian liberals
    Nanny Orwell wants to rule the world
    Oh Brave New World
    Nanny State index
    Surveillance

  • The Establishment Closes Ranks To Protect Its Own

    Leon Brittan (a man with much to worry about?) wears a worried frown (source)

    The first person appointed to head the enquiry into an alleged cover up of sex crimes committed against children by senior figurews in politics, the judiciary and the civil service was forced by a public outcry to step down because her late bother, Sir Michael Havers, had, as Attorney General been directly involved in efforts to stop the allegations being properly investigated.

    To lose one independent inquiry head is unforunate, two lose two looks like carelessness as Oscar Wild might have said had he been around.

    The replacement head of the national child sex abuse inquiry is also facing calls to quit before the investigation starts, as the full extent of her links to Conservative grandee Leon Brittan who was Home Secretary at the time these allegations first emerged and who himself is widely rumoured to have been named in connection with abuse allegations. The extent of Woolf's links with Lord Brittan and his family were revealed today.

    Three Labour MPs warned that Fiona Woolf should not carry out the probe into how historic abuse ­allegations were handled because of her social ties to the Brittan whose name, it is believed, was mentioned in a dossier handed to him by 'battling' Barbara Castle, the former Labour cabinet minister and MP for Blackburn.

    Woolf admitted d that she has enjoyed five dinner parties with Leon Brittan and his wife, prompting Labour MP and leading campaigner in the bid to expose paedophile cover ups, Simon Danczuk to comment: "In the world where I come from if you have people round for dinner regularly, you would consider yourselves friends.” and added: "The public will suspect the government is trying to protect Leon Brittan.”

    Labour's Ian Austin said she had met the peer "more frequently than I have seen some members of my family”. He added: "Do you think the public's confidence in your ability to examine what was happening when Lord Brittan was Home Secretary won't be affected by what clearly, I would think and most people would think, is a close personal contact?”

    Baroness Butler-Sloss stepped down as the head of a major inquiry into child abuse claims because of her links to several figures involved in the abuse allegations. This latest attempt to hand control of the enquiry to an establishment figure with links to Leon Brittan will add credibility to accusations that the government is not only protecting Leon Brittan and others but protecting Westminster and the establishment from a hugely embarrassing scandal if the entire VIP paedophile story and all the associated cover ups and whitewashes actually came out into the public domain in the run up to a General Election.

    Excuse me, I think I hear the sound of someone creeping around in hush puppies, better go and check that the grandkids are safe.

    RELATED POSTS:
    British Democracy In Terminal Decline - Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year
    When did democracy go out of fashion. I don't remember voting on whether we wanted to give up our civil liberties or be ruled by a dictatorship of unelected bureaucrats from Brussels, but that is where we are heading, along with the other free nations of Europe. And the USA, so-called land of the free is further along the road to fascism than Europe.

    Taxi Customers In Heywood / Rochdale Ask For 'Local' Drivers

    A taxi company in the child-sex scandal hit town Heywood, is now offering customers option of requesting white-only cab drivers, after two former 'Asian' drivers were imprisoned for their roles in the sexual exploitation gang.
    Police to Investigate Allegations of Labour-LibDem Rochdale 'Deal' on Paedophiles
    What A Wonderful Result
    Simon Danczuk Becomes A National Hero
    Leftie paedos and the New World Order
    Left Love Paedophiles
    NWO Paedophile

  • Our humour hits the bottom

    Casually browsing 't internet my attention was caught by a story of two turd burglars brilliant and beautiful young gays who were asked to leave a London bus by its driver who did not approved of homosexual behaviour.

    Now yoiu can read the rest of the story HERE if you like, but it isn't worth the effort, I promise. Neither is most of the comment thread which as you might expect consists of people expressing dislike of homosexuality and people who think homosexuality is so wonderful it is a violation of same sex couples' rights, a hate crime and an act of religious bigotry to refuse them licence to get their kit off and have full sex in public.

    There was one little section of the comment thread that is really worth looking at however. You'd never have thought there were so many arseholes in London ...

    COMMENTS:

    Comparethemarxists • 40 minutes ago

    Where were they off to on the bus, Ponders End?

    Harry Meneely @ Comparethemarxists • 39 minutes ago

    Crouch end???

    Ed Butt @ Harry Meneely • 3 minutes ago

    or Pratt's Bottom?

    Comparethemarxists @ Harry Meneely • 38 minutes ago

    They would have to take the ring road if they were going there.

    Harry Meneely @ Comparethemarxists • 36 minutes ago

    That's worth 1000 "ups"

    Ace55 @ Harry Meneely • 15 minutes ago

    Cockfosters?

    Old Goat Ace55 • 14 minutes ago

    Arsenal?

    Old Goat @ Old Goat • 14 minutes ago

    Or even Welwyn...

  • Islam To Be Official Religion In Anglican, Catholic, Jewish Schoools?

    It all gets more insane with every week that passes.

    New regulations that were intended to encourage the inculcation of “British Values” in schools are now being usurped to force a Christian school to accept Islamification or face possible closure. The reason is that they have not invited an Imam to address the The Christian Institute school assembly, reports a charity helping to defend them from the Department for Education.

    The small independent school which has not been named is in the home counties. Governors have been warned that te schools rating under the Independent Schools Standards framework would be changed from “Good”, to merely “Adequate” because of its failure to meet the new requirements on promoting diversity.

    Before the left - wing idiot fringe start screeching that religion should be banned from schools, 'fraid it would do no good you politically correct fools. The regulations could be used to force secular schools to allow Islamic preachers to address pupils.

    The new rules, which were introduced after the Islamist ‘Trojan Horse’ scandal to prevent radicalisation of children in Britain’s schools appears to have suffered from the law of unintended consequences (as any document drafted by public service workers tends to do) as they are now being used to interfere with traditional British schools instead.

    The Department for Education (DfE) says promoting “acceptance and engagement” and “tolerance and respect of all faiths and cultures” in schools now means going a lot further than school trips to Mosques and Temples, which has been the case in the past. The new rules mean the state is forcing faith schools, such as Anglican, Roman Catholic and Jewish schools to invite faith leaders such as Muslim Imams who are oppsed to the teachings of the schools sponsoring faith to lead lessons.

    Where will it end. Will feminist studies classes have to hear lectures on the advantages for women of polygamous partnerships? Will home economics classes be treated to lectures on how to prepare and serve human organs? Will children be encouraged to have a go at slaughtering small, furry animals halal style?

    RELATED POSTS:

    Death In The Desert - An Ill-Fated Attempt to Reach Fortress Europe.

  • Orwell Was Not Wrong About The Result - Only The Year

    Socialist believer and those who love authoritarianism, big government and concepts such as each of us having our own personal government snooper whose job is to make sure we never step out of line, never try to think for ourselves and never even question the authority of the government to keep us under constant surveillance, tell us what we can and cannot read, say, think or how much we can eat and drink like to say "No na nah na naaa, Orwell was wrong, it's thirty years past 1984 and we're still free to do as we are told.

    As usual they are so wrong in so many ways. 1984 was an allegorical date, a reversal of the two final digits of 1948, they year in which his dystopian novel was written. What he was telling readers was, "this is what the future holds unless we reject oligarchic collectivism now."

    And now in 2014, those with eyes to see and ears to hear must be aware '1984' has been with us for a long time. It just crept up so stealtily most sheeple did not notice. This cartoon says it all ...

  • Second And Even More Lethal Strain Of Ebola Now Infecting People In Congo - Le Monde

    This Is Getting Serious. France's Le Monde reports:

    En RDC, 70 cas ont été confirmés, avec 47 décès, soit un taux de mortalité d'environ 70 %, similaire à celui observé en Afrique de l'Ouest. (In the DRC, 70 cases have been confirmed, including 47 deaths, a mortality rate of about 70%, higher than that observed in West Africa). | AFP/KATHY KATAYI

    We may now be facing two deadly Ebola outbreaks, a new strain of the virus which so far has killed 71 percent of those infected has been discovered in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). This is a higher mortality rate than the strain that has killed over 3000 people in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea.

    The virus in the DRC outbreak, which is nearly 2,300 miles away from the most eastern extent of the much larger West-African outbreak, has been studied by a joint French-Canadian team of virologists for the World Health Organisation who confirmed that it was distinct, sharing only 96.8 percent of genetic material: "The complete genome sequence of the virus responsible [ ... ] confirms that it is a virus Ebola species but it shows that the Congolese strain is different from Africa West”.

    The first cases in the new outbreak were recorded in August, and unlike the West-African disease the US Centre for Disease Control records a ‘patient-zero', a pregnant woman who slaughtered and prepared bush meat.

    Due to "local customs” observed after her death, several more became infected by her body and 46 have now died in the region.

    Although it has a distinct origin to the West-Africa outbreak, the Congo strain is related to previous outbreaks in the Central-African country, and is "very similar” to the outbreak that ravaged the Congo and her neighbours from 1995 to 1997.

    Ebola is a recurring issue for the Congo, where the virus was first identified in the settlements along the banks of the river Ebola, from which it takes its name. This is the seventh local outbreak since the first in 1976, although in the past the events have typically lasted years and infected hundreds rather than thousands. It is this extraordinary speed with which new cases are spread and the high mortality rate that makes the present outbreak notable to the scientific community, who have recorded some 4,500 deaths so far.

    (Translated with a little help from Babelfish.com and summarised from Le Monde - Planete.)

    And the questions still remain:

    Why does the US Government hold a patent on the ebola virus?
    What was a biological weapons research team from the US Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) supplemented by scientists from Tulane University up to in their experiments on ebola carried out in a lab in Sierra Leone up until the government of that country threw them out earlier this year?

    We still say pople in the west do not have much to worry about, better diet and more hygienic living conditions should keep us safe. The confusion and ineptitude being shown by our leaders, and the sheer dishonesty of mainstream media's reporting of the ebola outbreak is a cause for serious concern however.
    You'll find more in this post.

    On the other hand it would be a mistake to get complacent. A lot could still go wrong. This for example:

    The European Union Plan to Takeover UK NHS Response to Ebola

    RELATED POSTS:
    The Ebola Outbreak - Natural Disaster Or Man Made Catastrophe
    Health Menu
    Why does US Government hold a patent on Ebola>
    Ebola does Dallas
    Ebola and the Absent “Humanitarians”

  • Ciggy's £1.50 each. I smell an opportunity

    Smokers face Nanny State Naziism (picture source)

    Surrounded by almost TTIP levels of security, the World Health Organization (WHO) is conducting its biennial Conference of the Parties in Moscow between 13th to the 18th October.

    Attended by most signatory nations to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the aim of the convention is to make tobacco as profitable as heroin restrict and control people who smoke tobacco, "vape” electronic cigarettes, nicotine mouth stimulant, snus, and use Shisha pipes. It has 179 members who are mostly sovereign states plus the European Union.

    The giveaway that reveals the convention is really about bureaucratic control freakery lies in the clause about controlling electronic cigarettes. While users get their nicotine hit, the vapour does not have the same impact on health because the vapour is free of tar. But people enjoy it and so Nanny State and her Thought Police thugs must try to ban it.

    But things are not proceeding to plan for the control freaks. running The conference has been boycotted by USA and Canada over President Putin's involvement in the Ukraine while Director General Dr. Margaret Chan has been criticized for cozying up to Putin and praising Russia's recent tobacco control measures.

    Meanwhile in the Philippines, Ian Smith, the Executive Director of the Director-General's Office is talking to the Regional Committee for the Western Pacific about the Ebola outbreak. He says, "The Director-General sends you her best wishes for a productive session (on stopping the spread of Ebola). Unfortunately she is fully occupied with coordinating the international response to what is unquestionably the most severe acute public health emergency in modern times.”

    Yes, fully occupied in Moscow talking tobacco in preference to what many would believe is the far more pressing problem of the Ebola outbreak. Is Dr. Chan suffering from something of an obsession? You may say that, I couldn't possibly comment.

    What has really created dissent is the secret nature of the Moscow event. No media is allowed, and the votes taking place – including the one to back a "global tobacco tax", which is said to have passed – are not being formally recorded. Its as open and accountable as the Bilderberg Group or the TTIP negotiations.

    Journalists and the public have been entirely excluded frm the conference sessions. Mohamed Daganee, Libya's former Health Information Director said, "We don't know who [the public] are,” while a Ugandan representative proclaimed: "We don't need the public here!”

    One item of leaked news from inside the conference is that a statement of intent to raise the cost of a pack of cigarettes to £33 ($50) through taxation.

    So as no politician will oppose the war on enjoyment, I'm off to liduidise £100,000 of assets and invest it in contraband ciggies. After all Al Capone did well out of alcohol when they banned that.

    RELATED POSTS:

    More (much more) on Nanny State

  • Ebola, Stock Market, Nuclear War. It's all going tits up. WTF?

    We're fucked.
    How fucked are we, you might well ask.
    We're fucking fucked, that's how fucked we are.

    Woke up this morning (I know that sounds like the opening of a blues song, but bear with me), leisurely breakfast, watched the news - Osborne wittering about how well they economy was doing (which was an ominous sign), read for a while, drove Mrs T down the shops. Came in, turned on the computer.

    First thing I see, Greece is facing economic meltdown. Nothing new there then, Greece is always facing economic meltdown. Next item:

    "We're Screwed” Says White House Correspondent and Government Document Surfaces Exposing the Real Truth Behind Ebola

    by Lisa Haven, Pakalert Press

    News about the widening Ebola outbreak is getting worse by the day. Thus far, 7,000 persons have been infected and about 3,500 have died—including our first official case in Dallas, Texas. Furthermore, rumors have been circulating about the possibility of Ebola infected persons from Arizona all the way to Washington D.C.

    If these headlines have left you wondering whether we are nearing a global pandemic with scenes reminiscent of movies like "Outbreak”, then here is something to ponder, at a recent Ebola conference White House Correspondent with CBS News Major Garrett, accidently left his mic on and was caught saying "Were Screwed” about the Ebola virus

    But that's not all, recently I came across a document put out by medical professionals (and others) titled, Hemorrhagic Fever Virus as Biological Weapon Medical and Public Health Management. This document revealed more about Ebola then I wished to know!

    Then I read that we are closer than ever to war with Russia and China over Ukraine and Syria, thanks to the stupidity of our politicians who just can't see that when the west starts meddling in the affairs of nations with vastly different cultures to our and when we try to impose on them by force, our culture and values, things never turn out well.

    Due to our Stupid Politicians – Nuclear War Could Be Near.

    There are a lot of stupid politicians the world over, mot of the stupidest it seems in the USA and UK. The US, backed by the UK and EU are dangerously close to stumbling into a war with Russia over Ukraine that could go nuclear and kill hundreds of millions of people in a single day, one of the world's leading authorities on the consequences of nuclear conflict warned in Washington this week.

    "It's an incredibly dangerous situation. … If there's a nuclear war tonight, that's the Northern Hemisphere (of the entire world) gone, Dr. Helen Caldicott told a National Press Club Newsmakers news conference on Wednesday. She was speaking on the topic: "Ukraine: Is Nuclear Conflict Likely?”

    And finally another headline caught my eye and I looked at the stock markets to find that stock markets in Europe, America and Asia are collapsing. Oh well, that's better news. I put my investments into safer havens over a year ago. :D

    So how will all this turn out. Check back 28 Days Later and I'll let you know.

    RELATED POSTS:
    New Global Crisis Imminen, New Geneva Report Warns
    Financial Crisis? The Dow Has Already Fallen More Than 1000 Points From The Peak Of The Market
    Debt Crisis
    Corporate Banker's $1.5 Quadrillion Conspiracy: EU Accuses 13 Banks Of Operating A Derivative Trading Cartel
    Why Does US Government Hold A Patent On Ebola Virus
    Ebola: scaremongering or shit creek
    Ebola hits America
    Eurogeddon
    Ukraine: The Brink Of Nuclear Holocaust
    Obama and Kerry - American warmongers

  • The Real Significance Of The Jimmy Savile Case

    I've always liked Anna Raccooon blog, it has always, since starting to look in about five years ago I have found it consistently intelligent, well written, unafraid of controversy and prepared to take a libertarian stance (for the benefit of Prof. Want - War, our resident academic village idiot, and other politically illiterate lefties, libertarian does not mean extreme right wing.

    Forget that lefties in the UK have labelled UKIP as a rebranded BNP, the Labour left are really only part a global fascist movement dedicated to totalitarian rule by the elite.

    Recently I went off Anna's blog. Suzanne (the eponymous Ms. Raccoon) took a rather different view to mine on the Jimmy Savile case. No problem with that, she has spent years as a lawyer working in the Court Of Protection, so her opinion on the lack of reliable evidence on Savile and other cases of historic sex abuse and other aspects of law are from a legal perspective more valid than mine.

    Jimmy Savile on Jim'll Fiddle With It - the body language says it all

    Unfortunately this reasonable line has attracted a type of commenter who is sure there is nothing underhand going on, that there is no corporate push to gain control of states and their insitutions, and that cases such as Jimmy Savile's paedophile activities are a lot of fuss about nothing. Their attitude is a kind of argument from authority (the voice of reason?): "Any intelligent person would understand there are no great conspiracies (they haven't heard of TTIP)and our governments would
    never lie to us.

    Now Anna is somewhat responsible for that, she doesn't like 'conspiracy theorist' phrases such as New World Order (although the phrase has been used by David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Pappy Bush and many others in calling for the establishment of a global government controlled by the elite) mainstream media, Illuminati or Scientific Dictatorship. Again I don't have a problem with Anna, her blog, her rules. What does piss me off is the frequency of comments sneering at 'conspiracy theorists' (who are for the most part really just people questioning the establishment), but I do get impatient with people whose only reason for commenting is to undermine others and dismiss valid opinions.

    Back to the Savile case, which while Anna Raccoon makes valid points about unreliability of witness evidence on events which occurred many years ago, they smug, authority worshipping people who dismiss our concerns are truly naive when saying "its just a lot of fuss about nothing, only Daily Mail readers are taken in by it," are the ones who really miss the point.

    People are concerned not about the sex crimes of men like Savile and Cyril Smith who are now dead, or Stuart Hall and Rolf Harris although we accept their crimes were heinous and made worse by abuse of their status and the victims deserve justice - to be believed at last if nothing else.

    Our real concern is and has been for decades among those who had our ear to the ground was that things which should have been investigated were covered up to protect celebrities and establishment figures. Unlike the smug, pompous bastards in Anna's comment threads who are sure there is nothing going on and it's just Daily Mail readers getting their knickers in a twist, some of us knew that suggestions about Jimmy Savile's unsavoury sex drive were more than rumour, genial, jolly Stuart Hall was a notorious sex pest, bluff, straight talking Cyril Smith and Greville Janner with his magic tricks liked fiddling with little boys.

    It is things like the news story linked below which concern us, not because we want retribution against dead men and geriatrics, but because despite who smug twats in comment threads who're sure there is nothing they do not know many tell you, the culture of cover up is still very active and will continue to be until it is broken either by the democratic process or campaigns of civil disobedience.

    Police admit they were told Jimmy Savile was a paedophile a DECADE before he was exposed

    RELATED POSTS:


    Taxi Customers In Heywood / Rochdale Ask For 'Local' Drivers

    A taxi company in the child-sex scandal hit town Heywood, is now offering customers option of requesting white-only cab drivers, after two former 'Asian' drivers were imprisoned for their roles in the sexual exploitation gang.

  • MH-17 Report False Flag Exposed After Revelation Passenger Was Wearing Oxygen Mask

    Laugh? I nearly shat as I thought of all those hysterical lefties falling over themselves to follow Barack Obama blaming Russia for bringing down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine. Obama of course had claimed the USA had compelling evidence that Russia was involved but when challenged to produce it, told media representatives he couldn't as "it would compromise US National security" (i.e. prove the Americans are a bunch of trigger happy, war loving shits).

    Since then of course a steady drip of factual and forensic evidence has shown it is more likely the USA / EU backed neo-Fascist regime in Ukraine was responsible for the outrage.

    So as usual on the longer timeline I was right, they hysterical hand wringers were just being hysterical (one of them, a prize dick, asked me if I knew what hysterical meant - yes I do, both in the medical and the colloquial context and it is used colloquially here - do not be taken in by any argumentum ad auctōritās from some cupid stunt waving his qualifications at us or claiming he is a university lecturer as if that gives him some divine right to tell us what to think.

    Such people have nothing except delusions of superiority to back up such attempts to suppress intelligent discussion. Read this and make up your own minds about the latest leak from the great Flight MH17 Cover UP:

    Emirates Airways CEO Thinks He Knows What Happened to Flight MH370

    from The Daily Stirrer

    One of the two biggest stories in 2014 was the complete disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 on a routine flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Seven months later not a trace of the Boeing 777 aircraft or any of its passengers has been located. As the official explanations grow increasingly more ludicrous, German magazine Spiegel Online is running an interview with Sir Tim Clark, CEO of Emirates Airlines who shares some interesting thoughts on what might have happened to the large and technically advanced aircraft. He also has some strong opinions on what certainly did NOT happen to it.

    Clark (64) has been a senior manager for Emirates since 1985 and has played a big part in developing it into one of the world's largest airlines. He is an acknowledgeable expert on the aviation industry. His view of the vanished Malaysian Airlines flight MH 370 is a provocative one. The plane that disappeared was a Boeing 777 and Emirates operates 127 such aircraft, more than any other airline in the world.

    I Wonder if the screamers are going to dismiss him as a 'conspiracy theorist' because if they don't, they owe me and many other rational thinkers in new media an apology. More likely they will just retreat further into the realm of fantasy.

  • Will The Government Run Out Of Money For Pensions While Still Fighting America's Wars

    The Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) has warned that cash reserves set aside to fund state pension payments are set to run out as soon as next year.

    In the report published on Friday, CPS claimed it had found a "serious flaw” in the government accounts (not surprising seeing as they are compiled by members of the public service unions), and because of this the government will find itself short of cash for pensions sometime in 2015.

    The authors added that the underfunding will force the Treasury to increase taxes in order to ensure pension payouts continue.

    Michael Johnson, speaking for CPS warned that the current state pension level is "unsustainable,” adding the pension will be "watered down to a basic subsistence” in the near future if the government fails to take urgent action.

    The research also found that people under the age of 45 would have to wait longer to qualify for their state pension while those under the age of 35 should expect pension payments to be scrapped altogether by the time they retire. People currently in work should expect large tax increases to fund pensions, Johnson said.

    Or perhaps our fuckwith leaders could simply stop joining in all America's wars and flying bombing missions at £1,000,000 a bang. We could leave the EU and save £40 million A DAY, that would fund a few pensions.

    And perhaps, to cite a couple of examples of how the incompetence of morons employed in the public services and protected from consequences by the too-powerful and entirely politically motivated public service unions, civil service purchasing officers could learn that rather than paying £3000 per bog standard, network ready PC they can buy them retail for £300 each (and that's expensive) or shelling out £1500 for an NHS Wheechair when a very adequate vehicle can be had for £99.

    NHS standard whhelchair - nasty, heavy, clunky and expensive.

                   Lightweight wheelchair (uses aluminium tubing instead of steel), fit for purpose and cheap (£99)

    Problem: Government wastes shitloads of money and can't pay its bills.
    Solution: Abolish public service unions that reward incompetence, sack incomptent public service purchasing officers, hire over 45s with losts of experience in the private sector to make sure taxpayers are getting value for money. Simples.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.