Search blog.co.uk

  • Rotherham: The Shit Hits The Fan

    Abuse victim
    Child sex abuse victim (source)

    A few months ago I was speaking to an old work colleague who lives in Blackburn and is a Labour Party member. He used to be quite prominent in the party but now takes a less active role as he does not much like the direction the party has taken, believing like many old Labour activists, the hierarchy has lost touch with its core constituency.

    We were chatting about this and that when I remarked that the town's MP Jack Straw would be missed.

    My friend, who has known the MP for many years, agreed but said Mr. Straw had decided to go "before the shit hits the fan."

    When I asked for more he reminded me that Straw had tried to raise the issue of paedophile activity in the child care system when in Blair's cabinet and had been warned off because it was "racially sensitive."

    In the past two years we have had 'grooming' scandals in Rochdale, Bradford and Oxford and Jack Straw had, in condemning Labour's open doors immigation policy had referred specifically to grooming and abuse of under age white girls by Muslim men in the Blackburn constituency so I assumed the phrase 'before the shit hits the fan' referred to foreknowledge that there was a lot more to emerge and it will probably not be confined to Labour controlled councils covering up such scandals because of their commitment to multiculturtalism and equality. Throughout government at all levels there is a culture of coverup and whitewash.

    Multicuturalism does not mean Muslims are above the law, or are entitled to be judged by Sharia law while in Britain.

    An investigation has revealed that at least 1,400 children as young as 11 years of age were subjected to ?appalling? sexual exploitation in England?s town of Rotherham during a 16-year time period. This is a scandal that has been on the back burner for a while because mainstream media gave diverted public attention by obsessing about Jimmy Saviler, Cyril Smith and other celebrities.

    According to an independent probe by Professor Alexis Jay, the children were victims of gang rape and other forms of abuse from 1997 to 2013.

    There has been some attempt in Rotherham to point the finger at a difficult financial climate as the cause of the department’s failings. The introduction to a report entitled A review of the response to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham compiled by the Rotherham Local Safeguarding Children’s Board, includes the following: "This attention has rightly focused on how children in the Borough have been protected from abuse, but within the tight fiscal controls that have been set, partners need to ensure that all aspects of safeguarding children and adults are dealt with appropriately."

    Amazingly, the report goes on to say "both the media and public perception has been that Rotherham has failed to protect children involved in CSE or identified offenders and brought them to justice."

    "Perception however is not always reality. It is now clear that CSE, in whatever form it takes, and there are a number of ways it can be expressed, is pervasive across the length and breadth of the country."

    In other words, "Everybody else is to blame and how can we protect children in care when there's a paedophile under every stone and behind every bush". Only there isn't.

    According to Jay's report, under the Labour government when public spending was at a historical high, the Labour council starved the department of resources, leading to low morale and severe under-staffing.

    The report states "The Lead Member for Children and Young People's Services (2005-2009) indicated he had become increasingly concerned about the underfunding of safeguarding services during his time in office, and was frustrated by the lack of response to this from other members."

    Yet between 2010 and 2013 these problems have been dealt with, as the report details: "Budgeted expenditure on Rotherham children’s social care increased in real terms by 31.8 percent in the four years to 2013.This compared with an average increase of 2.6 percent for its benchmarking group. […] In the four years to 2013/4, it went from having the lowest spend (£406 per child) to being at the median of the group (£604 per child)."

    It is clear from then that with the oversight of the Coalition government the Labour run council has managed to do much better for children in its care. Rotherham council must not be allowed to shift the blame to Westminster, but must instead take full responsibility for its failure in one of the most sensitive areas voter have entrusted to it.

    Given the left wing hatred of British values and determination to turn the UK into a middle eastern Muslim theocracy on the western fringe of Europe, we can expect much more news in a similar vein. Remember though, most Muslims are good people who accept our laws and cultural traditions. It is the the bourgeois left and elitist supporters of the Labour party that think they have a duty to act as facilitators for Muslim criminals and extremists in this nation.

  • It's DSKja-Vu all over again: IMF Christine Lagarde Head Formally Charged In Fraud Probe.

    IMF Christine Lagarde Head Formally Charged In Fraud Probe.

    Ah the joys of a long timeline; those who predict the worst will invariable be proved correct. Cost you mind back about three years to when a scandal erupted over the behaviour of International monetary fund (IMF) chief Demonique Dominique Strauss Khan who, accused of sexually assaulting a chamber main in his New York hotel was revealed in the subsequent kerfuffle to have been spending taxpayer's money on hiring prostitutes a busload at a time for private sex parties.

    Until then Strauss Khan had been front runner to take over the French Presidency from Nicolas Sarkozy. Did Francoise Hollande's Socialists have anything to do with tipping off the media about DSK's like peccadillos? You may say that, I could not possibly comment. In the end however, no amount of whitewash could save Strauss Khan.

    French politics looks, to an outsider, much more fun than ours. They get prostitutes by the dozen, what do we get? Paedophile allegations not properly followed up, paedophile activity given a free pass, government ministers hiring illegal immigrant nannies and a taxpayer funded Duck Island.

    By the time DSK's successor, the elegant elitist socialist Christine Legarde had been appointed, Boggart Blog had already predicted that in the era of new media, with the credibility of mainstream news evaporating rapidly and the blogosphere always ready to shine a light on the corruption and self interest endemic in modern politics, more and more scandal would be exposed and rumours circulating about banker Legarde's associations with shady figures in French business such as Bernard Tapie, her own demise was inevitable.

    legarde ... dominique strauss khan
    Christine Legarde and DSK

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    In the end it was only a day after President Hollande appointed a new government (the third this year) that the person who so eagerly stepped in after DSK's infamous and some say choreographed fall from grace, Christine Lagarde is about to be DSKed herself after "someone" clearly has set their sights on the former French finance minister who was rumoured to have Presidential ambitions of her own.

    When news broke that a French court had placed Mme. Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, under a formal probe for negligence in a corruption investigation dating back to her days as finance minister it was hardly a shock. Just over a year ago banner headlines in the French press screamed "IMF's Lagarde Flat Raided Over French 'Payout' Probe", further damaging head of the IMF already suffering loss of credibility from numerous allegations of impropriety involving the Tapie matter.

    Until now, such rumours were below the radar, and thus stayed largely in French domestic news. It now appears Madame's turn for Andy Warhol's promised fifteen minutes of fame, even if Lagarde hasn't grasped it just yet.

    from The Wall Street Journal:

    Ms. Lagarde confirmed the decision in a statement but said it was "without basis," adding she would challenge it with a higher court. She said she was heading back to Washington Wednesday and would brief the IMF board about the latest development.

    The investigation is part of a complex, drawn-out probe into the alleged misuse of state funds. The case stems from a decision in the 2008 to use arbitration to settle a dispute with business tycoon Bernard Tapie. The arbitration panel awarded €420 million to Mr. Tapie.

    "The magistrates of the court of justice of the Republic have decided to place me under formal investigation," Ms. Lagarde said in statement. "After three years of procedure, the sole surviving allegation is that through inadvertence or inattention I may have failed to intervene to block the arbitration that brought to an end the longstanding Tapie litigation," she added.

    Given the ability of organisations from all around the globe to close ranks and cover up the malfeasance of managers the question now is who was angered by her policies over the past three years and why.

    And we think we know.

    Only yesterday Boggart Blog was reporting on the US led cover up of an official report on the downing of Flight MH17 Today we report the imminent appointment of MMe. Legarge avec MMe. Guillotine (careerwise anyway). And tomorrow?

    ... A broad-based tax cut, for example, accommodated by a program of open-market purchases to alleviate any tendency for interest rates to increase, would almost certainly be an effective stimulant to consumption and hence to prices. Even if households decided not to increase consumption but instead re-balanced their portfolios by using their extra cash to acquire real and financial assets, the resulting increase in asset values would lower the cost of capital and improve the balance sheet positions of potential borrowers. - Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the US Federal Exchange.

    Legarde has been blocking this idea and here's why.

    Stripped of financial jargon, The Fed is saying that in a world drowning in debt, there are only two options to extinguish said debt: inflate it away or default. Anything else is kicking the can while making the problem even worse.

    In the last phase before complete collapse the Keynesian economics academe has no choice but to gamble "all in" with the last and only bluff it had left before admitting the economic system it created, one which has borrowed so extensively from the future to fund the present that there is no future left, has failed.

    The remedy for this proposed by Bernanke and the Obama Administration is to modify the failed policy of Quantitative Easing by cutting out the middle man. While governments run a systemic deficit they must borrow each month to fund their financial obligations. The means of borrowing is by selling bonds on which the taxpayers' pay interest. US Treasury Bonds pay 3.1% interest, UK bonds cost us 3.5%. Now while interest rates on money loaned by governments has been held at between 0% and 0.5% the banks have been borrowing from governments at those rates and lending the money straight back by buying bonds that pay over three percent.

    because that has failed, the Fed (and you can be sure The Bank Of England and The European Central bank will not be far behind) plan to stimulate their economies by cutting taxes or possibly introducing negative income tax to encourage us punters to start spending again.

    It could only end in disaster as governments would have to borrow more money to fund the tax cuts.

    RELATED POSTS:
    G77 Nations vow to destroy America’s New World Order
    News Of The G20's New world Order global Bank
    The Folly Of Trying To Inflate Away Debt

    Conspiracy Of The Missing Quadrillion

  • 4 Nation Cover Up On Fate Of MH17 - Laugh? I Nearly Shat

    Perp Responsible For Downing In Ukraine of the Malaysian Airliner, Will Stay Hidden - five nation agreement to hide the facts implicates USA, Ukraine, Britain and Belgium

    What about Malaysia, don't they have an interest, you might well ask. Of course they do, but the government of Malaysia has an interest in the truth becoming public knowledge, while it seems to others do not.

    But what amused me about the nearest thing we are going to get to a resolution to this terrible event? It was a laugh of bitter irony actually, not about the event itself but the vitriolic attacks on me by stupid people who wanted to brand me a conspiracy theorist and right wing extremist because I disbelieved the ludicrous claims made by Barack Obama that he had 'compelling evidence' (i.e. he read it on Twitter) that Russia was in some way responsible.

    from Washington's Blog - Posted on August 24, 2014 by Eric Zuesse

    Regarding what caused the downing of the Malaysian airliner MH-17 in Ukraine on July 17th, the Ukrainian news agency UNIAN, reported in a brief Russian-language news story on August 12th, that four days earlier (August 8th) a representative of that nation’s Prosecutor General office, Yuri Boychenko, had said that (as auto-translated by google), “the results [of the investigation] will be announced upon completion of the investigation and with the consent of all the parties who signed the corresponding agreement.”

    This UNIAN report said that, “As part of the four-party agreement signed on August 8 between Ukraine, the Netherlands, Belgium and Australia [all of which nations are allies of the United States and are cooperating with its new Cold War against Russia], information on the investigation into the disaster Malaysian ‘Boeing-777’ will not be disclosed.” In other words: the official ‘investigation’ is being carried out by four nations that, as U.S. allies, are hostile toward Russia. One of those four nations, Ukraine, is not only a prime suspect in possibly having shot this airliner down, but is currently waging a hot war to ethnically-cleanse the pro-Russian population out of southeastern Ukraine; and the initial ‘news’ reports in Western ‘news’ media regarding the downing of MH-17 had said that this airliner was probably downed by the local rebels there, who were trying to shoot down the Ukrainian Government’s bombers that are constantly bombing them. Some Western ‘news’ reports even speculated that perhaps Russia itself had shot this airliner down.

    If the UNIAN news-report is correct, then there is no way that the ‘investigation’ will be able to be released to the public if it indicates that the Ukrainian Government (which, according to that news-report has veto power over the making-public of the study’s findings) is blamed for having shot the airliner down.

    On August 12th, another pro-Ukrainian-Government ‘news’ site, gordonua.com, headlined, as auto-translated by google, “GPU: The results of the investigation [into the] crash [of] the Boeing 777 will be released with the consent of the parties,” and said, “Information about the accident MH17 in the Donetsk region will be published in obtaining the consent of all the parties that are involved in the investigation.” UNIAN was cited there as gordonua’s sole source. ‘News’ media didn’t probe the matter further.

    Read full post at Washington's Blog

    Another POV:
    The Causes of the MH17 Crash are “Classified”. Ukraine, Netherlands, Australia, Belgium Signed a “Non-disclosure Agreement” - Global Research

    And so that you are forewarned against illiterate clown who comes along trying to tell you that only people who wear tin foil hats believe in conspiracies, let me remind you that a conspiracy is simply a group of people who are working together towards a mutually beneficial end and who will go to some lengths to keep knowledge of their collaboration out of the public domain. Simples - and not a tinfoil hat wearing, paedophile, shapeshifting, baby eating, alien reptillian Zionist banker in sight.

    lizard person
    (Source: Blogspot commons)

    RELATED POSTS:
    The Real Agenda Of Internet Trolls (fans of free speech they are not)

    US TV news: Zero evidence to prove MH17 shot down by pro Russian rebels

    Russia to request MH17 probe report
    MH17: More evidence points to Kiev / Washington False Flag
    Sensational Break From Official Lies - German Aviation Expert Says MH17 Brought Down By Air To Air Missile
    Who shot down MH17? Black Box Data Reveals Nothing We Did Not Know
    Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Evidence
    Boeing 777 Full Of Civilian Passengers Shot Down Over Ukraine

  • Microsoft Admits Banking $92 Billion Offshore to Avoid Paying $29 Billion in U.S. Taxes

    microsoft-tax

    No wonder the control freak and man who made 'not fit for purpose' acceptable quality for sale, Bill Gates can afford to be a philanthropist.

    Today we learned Microsoft Corp. is sitting on almost $29.6 billion it would owe in U.S. taxes if it repatriated the $92.9 billion of earnings being kept offshore, according to disclosures in the company’s annual filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The amount of money that Microsoft is keeping offshore represents a significant spike from prior years, and the taxes the company would owe amount to almost the entire two-year operating budget of the company’s home state of Washington.

    The company states it has “not provided deferred U.S. income taxes” because it claims the earnings were generated from its “non-U.S. subsidiaries” and then “reinvested outside the U.S.” Tax experts, however, say that details of the filing suggest the company is using tax shelters to dodge US taxes it owes as a company domiciled in the United States.’ READ MORE

    Yet in spite of that gates feels qualified to lecture Joe the Plumber, Fred the Carpenter and Chico the Cab Driver on their duty to pay tax. Where I come from we have a word for people like him - well several actually ...

    Linux is a nice operating system and if my daughhter can handle it, so can you.

    RELATED POSTS:

    Microsoft acting like Big Brother

    Microsoft think they are above the law

    Competition Is A Sin

    The elite planning a global takeover

  • Human DNA Shock: David Icke Was Right All The Time

    Do you remember the day David Icke emerged from the obscurity of being an former sports commentator to grab headlines by saying on television that the world was ruled by alien shape shifters. The event caused a burst of national hilarity and led a lot of people to get very confused about what a conspiracy theory actually is.

    Well newly published scientific research shows that Mr. Icke may have been right all along. About 30,000 years ago early human ancestors interbred with a species completely unknown to biologists, geneticists and anthropologists it reveals.

    homo knuckledraggius - homo erectus - homo spaiens
    Paleolithic pick up: Did homo knuckledraggius and homo erectus make homo sapiens? (source)

    Describing the findings, Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropolist at the London Natural History Museum has admitted that they don’t have any idea what the mystery species could be. The Denisovans, [CLICK] an ancient ancestor of Oriental people and the principle debunkers of that scientific dogma that all humans are descented from a single female, Mitochondrial Eve, had a segment of DNA that does not come from any species either extant or extinct that is currently known to science.

    The first bone fragment in which the alien DNA was identified in 2010 was discovered in a cave in Siberia. Subsequent finds and foresnsic examination confirm the DNA came from an unknown species.

    The level of this alien (not Alien please)DNA indicates there was some pretty serious interbreeding between Denisovans and the other unknown species approximately 30,000 years ago in Europe and Asia. Now it is generally accepted that Neanderthals were minging compared to the tall, long legged females of the Cro Magnon proto humans who existed at the time so seeing as beer wouldn’t be invented for another 25,000 years, thus it's unlikely we were all drunk or anything, they mystery deepens.

    According to University College London evolutionary geneticist, Mark Thomas, there may have been a great many hominid species living in Europe and Asia at that time.

    He said, “What it begins to suggest is that we’re looking at a ‘Lord of the Rings’-type world – that there were many hominid populations.”

    Cool, Hobbits, Elves, Dwarves, Trolls (no, we have enough of them online as it is,) Nazgul, Wargs and Orcs ... bring 'em on. That’s quite a mystery to ponder for the people who try to dismiss anything for which science does not have a glib answer as a 'Conspiracy Theory'.

    Pictures below - top: Cro Magnon Woman (a definite 10): right: - Neanderthal Woman (no score, even with beer goggles)

    cro magnon woman

    Neanderthal woman - not even with beer goggles

    MORE:

    DNA identifies new ancient human dubbed 'X-woman' - BBC
    Ancient Humans in Lord of the Rings World Indulged in Interspecies Sex

    RELATED POSTS:
    Questions about ancient humans
    First chavs lived in Norfolk
    The First humans From Australia Not Africa?
    Has human evolution stopped?
    Afrophilia - The Eagerness Of Academics And Liberals To Glorify Africa

  • UK Must Work With Assad To Combat ISIS? Laugh, I Nearly Shat.

    Richard Dannatt

    About two years ago the left-wing Nazis and other want-war oddballs were screaming for our government and the rest of the EU to support calls to war from President Hopey - Changey, Nobel PEACE Prize Obama, who wanted to send in troops under the cover of air strikes to help the brave, democracy loving, human organ noshing freedom fighters overthrow the brutal tyrant Assad.

    I came in for some criticism for suggesting we should stay out of Syria and all other local conflicts in the middle east and that while tyrants like Assad, Saddam and Gadaffi were authoritarian and oppressive at least they maintained a kind of order compared to what would replace them.
    About a year ago, frustrated by Assad's refusal to crumble and angered by the resistance of russia, China and Iran in resisting the planned American hegemony, Obama tried again. A poisoned gas attack for which the USA was too quick to blame forces loyal to Assad was proved to be a false flag incident, the gas having been fired by members of the terrorist rabble the USA had stitched together with funding and free weapons to fight Obama's proxy war in the middle east

    Again the 'liberal' want - war brigade tried to deny the mountain of evidence pointing to American efforts to manipulate events and provoke a regional war. And then things went quiet for a while. In the lull, the terrorist rabble, armed with American weapons supplied via internediaries like Turkey and Qatar, trained by American military advisers and funded by American and Saudi Arabian money formed ISIL / ISIS / Islamic state and set about re - establishing the medieval Islamic Caliphate complete with public floggings and beheadings, women being treated as their father's or husband's property and theocratic governments to enforce Sharia Law. And that's what our 'dark-skin-good-pale-skin-bad' progressive liberals call as result is it? One delusional idiot who thinks he can impress us by waving his academic qualifications in our faces commented in the usual sneering tone of someone with the kind of absofuckinglute certainty of his superiority that can only come from having less brain cells than testicles, commented, "You can't call what existed under those tyrants order."

    Can't I? A recent poll showed 70% of Libyans think life was better under Assad. Over 50% of Syrians supported Assad all through the civil war (if they hadn't he would not still be in power. We are witnessing in every television news bulletin the folly of overthrowing Saddam but lacking the commitment to leave an occupying army in his place.

    And now this:
    Britain must talk to dictator Assad to defeat ISIL (aki ISIS aka Islamic State), says General Lord Dannatt, former head of British Army

    Britain must co-operate with President Assad, the Syrian dictator, in order to confront Isil, the former head of the Army has said. General Lord Dannatt, the former Chief of General Staff, said the West must secure the permission of the Syrian government in order to launch airstrikes on Islamist militants.

    The remarks came as US General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said strikes inside Syria are necessary to defeat the organisation.

    General Lord Dannatt's comments come almost a year since David Cameron lost a Commons vote authorising air strikes on President Assad in response to chemical weapons attacks on civilians – action that would likely have toppled him from power.

    Britain and its allies have repeatedly called for Assad to step down to bring the three-year civil war that spawned Isil to an end.

    "The Syrian dimension has got to be addressed. You cannot deal with half a problem," he said. Isil must be "opposed, confronted and defeated” in Iraq and Syria before it spreads through the region, Lord Dannatt told BBC Radio 4.

    I don't know what is is about the left wing mindset that produces such an immutable inability to learn from past mistakes but just as socialist governments always a) screw up the economy of the country they govern and b) drift towards fascism and coercive law enforcement, so they are unable to understand from numerous failures that many nations around the world are just not ready for minority friendly, immigration obessed, nanny state pseudo-democracy. What makes their stupidity worse of course it when the social democratic model they try to impose fails they always attempt to prop it up by dropping bombs. I wonder if by now my critics will have learned enough common sense to STF up and see how things play out. And I will look forward to a grovelling apology from one academic clown. He needn't think that any comment other than a grovelling apology will stay in the thread for long.

  • OK Smartarse, So You Don't Believe Conspiracy Theories? Read This ...

    conspiracy
    (Source)

    As internet users you've all come across the kind of smart arse who thinks he has all the answers. The usually describe themselves as scientists or realists and are absolutely sure they are far too clever to be taken in by any of the nonsense that right wing extremist swivel eyed loons are always banging on about.

    Shape shifting lizards who control the world, Aliens living amongst us, Fallen angels who evolved into Zionist bankers? People wearing tin foil hats to block the mind control data the government is beaming into your head from GSM masts? It's all crazy nonsense isn't it and you know there's a rational explanation for everything.

    Well yes it is crazy nonsense, but no, there is not a rational explanations for everything and no, those things the irrational rationalists like to sneer at are not conspiracy theories.

    A conspiracy is simply a group of people working together towards a mutually beneficial goal which they would rather not have become public knowledge. The aliens, fallen angels and tinfoil hats are paranoia, a very different animal.

    So if you are one of those fearful, closed minded people who thinks America's push for war to achieve global hegemony, a corporate move towards global totalitarian government, collaboration between government and media to conceal the real news and Big Pharma trying to make us all patients for life are just nutty conspiracy theories dreamed up by insane people, you'd better not read this sensible and factual article from the very sensible Business Insider magazine.

    9 Things Dismissed At The Time As Conspiracy Theories That Were Later Proved True

    If you are one of those people who needs to believe the government is your bestest friend and mainstream media would never publish or broadcast anything but the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, the word will have dropped out of your bottom by the time you get to the end.

    RELATED POSTS:
    The science of saturated fat: A big fat surprise about nutrition?
    The Global Government Conspiracy

    Free trade conspiracy will abolish democracy

    Perpetual war: Military - Industrial complex

    The bankers Conspiracy and The Missing Quadrillion

    Competition is a sin

    Corporatism is fascism

    The corporate monopoly men

  • The Hate The Bourgois Left Find Acceptable

    You've heard them screaming often enough, the left wing bourgeoisie, jumping on every ism and phobia bandwagon that passes, accusing everybody who strays even slightly from the Politically Correct straight and narrow. UKIP are racist, people who read Nuts or Loaded are sexist, anyone who thinks same sex marriage is a joke is homophobic, anyone who says we don't need sharia law in the UK is Islamophobic.

    Strangely there is one prejudice and it is a real, deep-seated hatred rooted in fear, that these people find perfectly acceptable. It is the hatred the left wing bourgeoisie, for all their blether about fairness and equality, direct at the real working class.

    Hatred that leads to this irrational attack on high street pie shop Gregg's. This graphic, which originated on the Uncyclopedia website, appeared on Google search results for Gregg's after a hacker attack.

    greggs
    Greggs - supplying shit to scum for 70 years the photoshopped logo reads

    I don't know why Gregg's in particular attract such hatred from the pretentious left, but I've noticed quite a few of the current generation of painfully unfunny posh boy comedians categorizing Gregg's customers as ignorant, drunken, knuckle dragging neanderthals. Which obviously makes it OK to deride what these nasty little bigots see (incorrectly) as a shop that caters to the hated working class.

    Why? Nothing wrong with Gregg's stuff - their sandwiches are better than stuff from the trendy Subway chain, their coffee does not taste much like coffee but it tastes better than Starbucks dish water and their sausage rolls may be filled with lips and arseholes but as my brother will tell you, on a cold day on Whitehaven Market a Gregg's patsy just what you need (I've enjoyed them too but not in such extreme circumstances).

    I suppose the people who think Greggs have built their success on supplying shit to scum would have us all eating vegetable samosas that taste as if they are made from ground up rat turds bought from the Waitrose deli counter.

    One again we see that the people who scream and shout about 'diversity' don't know what the word means.

    The middle class twatocracy whose twitterings dominate social media, seem to think that while the favoured ethnic, sexual and religious minorities are beyond criticisms or satire, but having find some outlet for their natural anger and resentment somewhere, targets the working class in general and Greggs in particular. Yes, the Labour voting luvvies think, let's have a good snort at Greggs, with its customers in high-vis vests, its steak bakes and unsophisticated chocolate eclairs. Greggs is seen as being fair game because it's old-fashioned and blue collar: the very antithesis of organic, hand-reared, home-style, pretentiously labelled, overpriced food.

    Makes you realise what nasty, illiberal bigots these lefties are.

    RELATED POSTS:
    What drives the left's irrational hate
    The Politically Correct left runs on hate and hypocrisy
    Liberal bigots
    The left assume they have a monopoly on virtue
    Why do the left love paedophiles
    Illiberal liberals
    Backlash against left's smears helps UKIP
    When did the liberal left become authoritarian
    Politically Correct index

  • Everybody Goes Through Changes

    Do you remember that song from the 1980s Volkswagen Advert? The the lyric from 'Changes', Alan Price's reworking of the hymn tune "What A Friend We have In Jesus contained a message that is absolutely true.

    Everybody goes through changes,
    no one knows what's going .
    Everybody's changing places,
    but the world still carries on.
    Love must always change to sorrow,
    everyone must play he game,
    because it's here today and gone tomorrow,
    but the world goes on the same,

    (See below for the video)

    We all have to go through changes of course and those who can't change must cease to exist. For example,I was never keen on C S Lewis but decided I might have to reconsider when I read this:

    "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”— C.S. Lewis

    Read the article I found that quote with at A Government Of Wolves

    Does that description of the worst kind of tyranny remind you of anyone you know either5 personally or through public life. Any politicians or bureaucrats, supporters of a particular point of view or people who make careers of exercising their supposed moral superiority for example?

    Here's an example of the treatment meted out by the kind of hypocrites who oppress us for our own good.

    Mother Prosecuted For Keeping Daughter Home From School Over Cancer Fears

    A woman who kept her daughter off school over fears her cancer had returned is reportedly being prosecuted for not sending her to classes.

    Kerry Capper said she wanted to keep a close eye on seven-year-old Libby Bennett at home when she fell ill, because the youngster had developed similar symptoms when battling the disease.

    However, the unemployed mother has now been summoned to appear before magistrates for failing to pay a £60 penalty fine, after Libby missed seven days of school earlier this year.

    Read full story at Huffington Post

  • Funny Things Happen In Ukraine.

    troll
    Troll Alert - disinformation trolls sighted near Boggart Blog, shoot them on sight.

    Regular readers may have noticed that while Boggart Blog's editor was busy with other things, the team carried on endeavouring with the persistence of old fashioned investigative reporters who wore grubby Aquascutum raincoats and battered brown trilby hats tilted towards the back of their heads, always had a cigarette in their mouths and were never far from a glass of whisky (sorry, while we had builders in I rediscovered an old Dashiell Hammet novel) our efforts to present ALL the latest news and opinion on the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine have attracted trolls who seem to work on the principle that any ideas straying from the FUKUS axis propaganda must be suppressed.

    I'll deal with them another time.

    While media attention was focused on the accusations and denials, claims and counterclaims and general incoherent babble from the two sides, another strange episode was unfolding in Ukraine, the case of The Convoy That Never Existed.

    A story that broke in mainstream media last Thursday (14 August). headlined by one online news site as Disinformation War In Ukraine Escalates", it reported a Russian military convoy was attacked and almost completely "eliminated" on Ukraine territory on Thursday night, a statement which was also "confirmed" by none other than the Ukraine president, yet where not a single trace of evidence was released showing any such convoy destruction. Strange really because reporters from The Guardian and The Daily Telegraph reported having witnessed the burned out vehicles of the convoy "with their own eyes." (echoing Gulf War Iraqi information minister Comical Ali.

    So we were obviously in for yet another round of the war of disinformation, misinformation, deception, spin and downright lying, which we got on Sunday when Ukraine accused pro-Russian rebels on Monday of hitting a refugee convoy of buses with rocket fire near the eastern city of Luhansk, killing people trapped in the burning vehicles.

    Andrei Purgin, deputy prime minister of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic countered by saying, "The Ukrainians themselves have bombed the road constantly with airplanes and Grads. It seems they've now killed more civilians like they've been doing for months now. We don't have the ability to send Grads into that territory," said .

    Another rebel spokesman denied any civilian convoy had been struck, challenging the Kiev authorities to produce evidence. (Given the Kiev government or their supporters abysmal record on producing evidence to support Kiev's claims, we would advise you not to hold your breath.)

    So what if anything might have happened - and bear in mind that any statements from blog.co.uk's resident simple minded scientist (read the comment thread under that link) to the effect that "Barack Obama says the Kiev regime are the good guys so they must be telling the truth," do not constitute evidence.

    Soon after reports of the alleged Ukrainian attack on Russia's convoy hit western news feeds, the Russian defense ministry responded, saying that no Russian military column had crossed into Eastern Ukraine, and that reports wree based on "some fantasies."

    This is where the breakdown of logic occurs, because for Russia to make such a formal statement the Russian government obviously believes there is no evidence of destruction of a Russian convoy in Ukraine territory, something which obviously would exist if indeed as Ukraine's president had claimed, the "majority of the machines had been eliminated."

    If true, it also implies that either Ukraine had fabricated the entire story, and certainly the part about the destruction of the convoy and by extension that Russians had ever entered into East Ukraine.

    Unless, of course, there is evidence in the form of wrecked vehicles that something had happened, in which case the eye witness reports from the Guardian and Telegraph reporters (who, no matter what you think of their respective papers, are not idiots) are valid but a misunderstanding of what was seen.

    More to the point, the onus is on Ukraine to present some evidence, in fact any evidence, of a destroyed Russian military convoy instead of merely building upon a story conceived by the two UK media outlets, because if Ukraine indeed has no evidence, then its story falls apart and what's worse, the credibility and reputation of its government, of NATO and certainly of the UK press would be in tatters.

    So if Ukraine did not destroy a Russian convoy because there was no Russian convoy, but the British reporters saw wreckage that was evidence of an attack, what other possibility is there? Well, one that would destroy the credibility of the Ukraine government even more comprehensively than being caugh lying again, namely that in their enthusiasm for blowing things up, the Ukrainian military may have destroyed a convoy of its own military vehicles. A possible lead to such a turn of events comes from this Interfax report citing the leadership of the breakaway Donetsk People's Republic.

    "The leadership of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic has dismissed the Ukrainian government's statement on destroying a convoy of what appeared to be Russian armored vehicles in eastern Ukraine.

    "We haven't received any armored vehicles from Russia. No Russian units, including Russian armored vehicles, have crossed the border. Hence, no Russian armored vehicles could have been destroyed," DPR First Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Purgin told Interfax on Friday evening.

    But perhaps the most damning evidence comes from none other than the White House itself, which according to CNN just admitted that while it accuses Moscow of "incursions" it can't confirm the convoy was destroyed by Kiev.

    So as I said, this post is to help readers deal with pro war trolls, sick neo-fascist freaks that they are. It shows how to assemble evidence from many sources and analyse it. Trolls have no use for evidence, they work for one side or the other and merely repeat propaganda. And you've seen above how reliable a source propaganda is.

    RELATED POSTS:
    Was The Missile Attack On Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 Over Ukraine A False Flag Event.
    FUKUS axis imposes sanctions, Russian Oligarchs Shrug

    Ukraine Government Fires Missiles At Rebel Held Targets
    Sensational Break From Official Lies - German Aviation Expert Says MH17 Brought Down By Air To Air Missile

    US wants WWIII because its big banks are insolvent: Henderson
    Who shot down MH17? Black Box Data Reveals Nothing We Did Not Know
    Living within The Conspiracy

    Conspiracies index
    Russia to request MH17 probe report

    ef="http://www.greenteethmm.com/malaysian-airlines-coverup.shtml">Malaysia airlines Flight 370 cover - up

    Dreams Die First

    Oh Brave New World

    The Churches Are Burning

  • Islamic State Threatens UK Says Cameron. Have We Heard Anything Similar Before

    islamic state
    Regrets (source - New York Times)

    According to our Prime Minister, The West is engaged in a generational struggle against Islamic extremism that will threaten Britain unless urgent action is taken to defeat it, David Cameron warns today.

    (I told you those Tornado jet fighter planes were not in Iraq to drop bulk supplies of rice you beseiged Yazidis.)

    In an article for The Sunday Telegraph, the Prime Minister says the world cannot turn a blind eye to the creation of an extremist caliphate in the heart of the middle east.

    Warning that Islamic State fighters already control thousands of square miles of territory, Mr Cameron said if these extremists are not dealt with now, they will create a “terrorist state” on the shores of the Mediterranean.

    Now where have we heard something like that before? Oh yeah, anyone remember a certain traitor and war criminal named Blair saying we had to join G Dubya Bush's war in Iraq and give the project a veneer of legitimacy because Saddam's extremely well hidden (or imaginary) Weapons Of Mass Destruction could threaten us.

    It's like Deja Vu all over again.

    As it turned out Saddam was about as much of a danger to the west as a smelly fart. And the Islamic state will prove the same so long as we do not return to the idiotic and anti - British open doors immigration policy operated by THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT between 1997 and 2010 and only half heatedly changed by the Conservative and Lib Dem coalition.

    Come the election next year, if you think it's important to secure our borders and keep out terrorists, potential suicide bombers, murderers, rapists anf human organ noshers, you know what to do. Vote for a party that will get us out of the EU and operate sensible immigration controls.

    RELATED POSTS:
    UK Must Work With Assad To Combat ISIS? Laugh, I Nearly Shat
    The Iraq Genocide
    The Collapse Of Iraq
    Syria: The Real Agenda
    Why the FUKUS axis wanted war in Syria
    Why War Is Inevitable
    Perpetual War suits the power elite
    The Orwellian Paradox
    ]
    Songs Of Glory

    UK, US want new Iraq war under ‘humanitarian aid’

    Almost immediately after Cameron's call to war so that our tax money can prop up the failed Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama comes an admission that he lied about the extent of the humanitarian crisis.

    from PressTV

    Fast on the heels of the US admission that the crisis of the Yazidis was not everything Obama had told us, UK Prime Minister David Cameron said: “There are fewer people there and they are in better condition than expected.”

    This is not to say that the Yazidis that are on the mountain do not need aid desperately. They do. But where did the 40,000 facing imminent starvation figure and the claim of a non-existent siege come from? Cameron is not saying. But in the wake of those claims he has declared that effectively the UK -- as ever on American coat tails -- is about to embark on a new Iraq war, under the guise of “humanitarian intervention”:

    “It is very difficult in an area where you have got a lot of fighting taking place, you have got a lot of people moving around,” says Cameron. “So what you need to do is have plans that are flexible enough to respond to that situation. It is important to get the assets into place. That is why the Chinooks are there. That's why our Tornados are there.”

    Tornados are assault fighter jets that Cameron says are only being used for surveillance. But a number of MPs, taking their cue from the media that publicised the inflated Yazidis crisis, want a recall of parliament to allow Britain to join the US in launching air strikes against forces from the ISIL -- in short, they want another war in Iraq by the very states that caused such mass slaughter and destruction last time.

    Continue reading at PressTV

    It just gets Blairer and Blairer ...

  • Is It Lack Of Diversity That Makes Lefties Stupid?

    Quite a while ago now I wrote a post titled "Is It Lack Of Diversity That Drives Left wing Hate?" It contained these lines:

    There's an old joke;
    Q: "Why do teenagers only listen to other teenagers?" A: "Because they're stupid."
    Q: "Why are teenagers stupid?" A: Because they only listen to other teenagers."

    Substitute leftie, liberal, radical or progressive for teenager and that just about sums up the political 'left'. There is no diversity of opinion, unorthodox ideas are frowned on and deviation from the dogma (going off message) is an unforgivble sin. Thus they only ever talk to like minded people and their prejudices become reinforced.

    a gathering of lefties celebrate their diverity
    A gathering of lefties celebrate their diversity (source)

    Just recently the resident leftie pains in the arse have been irritating me a bit as I have tried to explore the news issues being most blatantly misrepresented in propaganda published by government / mainstream media. I wouldn't mind so much but all these people can offer by way of rhetoric is screams of "conspiracy theorist" (I don't find spurious links to form hasty conclusions, instead like a level headed and open minded commentator I consider all angles) and irrational name calling (right wing extremist might be an insult in the eyes of our Khymer Rouge fellow traveller colleagues, who are all scum sucking spawn of a pox whore's scab lice (now that's a insult), but anyone who thinks it describes my views is just politically illiterate).

    The other illustration of rhetorical incompetence from such people is to try claiming that I and similar 'nut jobs' are among a very small lunatic fringe who doubt the propaganda. The most recent issue this kind of dispute has centred on is the question of "Who Shot Down flight MH17?

    As I have already posted links to New Straits Times of Malaysia (that country's leading newspaper) Times of India (that counry's leading newspaper) and many other reliable sources only to have the lefties respond by repeating American propaganda lies that were discredited weeks ago, (repeat the lie often enough and it will become true - Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief) I now bring you an editorial from Asia Times Online which poses some interesting questions about Flight MH17 and the other Malaysia Airlines disaster, Flight MH370 and shows once again that opinion outside the Obamasphere is far more sceptical of FUKUS axis propaganda than the new Nazis:

    THE ROVING EYE
    Vanishing point …
    By Pepe Escobar

    First, passenger airliner MH370 vanished from Planet Earth. Then MH370 vanished from the news cycle. First, MH17 was shot down by "Putin's missile" - as Planet Earth was told. Then MH17 vanished from the news cycle.

    Where's Baudrillard when we need him? Had he been alive, the dervish of simulacra would have already deconstructed these two Malaysian planes as mirror images; from absolute vanishing to maximum exposure, then vanished again. They might as well have been abducted - and shot - by aliens. Now you seem them, now you don't.

    Black boxes, data recorders - everything MH17 is now floating in a black void. The British are taking forever to analyze the data - and if they have already done so, they are not talking. It's as if they were singing, I see a black box / and I want it painted black … void.

    The Pentagon, with 20-20 vision over Ukraine, knows what happened. Russian intelligence not only knows what happened but offered a tantalizing glimpse of it in an official presentation, dismissed by the "West". The best technical analyses point not to "Putin's missile" - a BUK - but to a combination of R-60 air-to-air missile and the auto-cannon of an Su-25.

    A reader led me to this fair assessment by former USAF and Boeing engineer Raymond Blohm: "With proper vectoring, a Su-25 need not be quite as fast as a Boeing 777 in cruise. It just has to get to a missile-firing position. Since the 777 was not maneuvering, it would be simple to pre-calculate when to get in a certain spot in the sky below the 777. From there, it's the missile that has the speed and altitude capability to hit the 777. (The R-60 is a very capable missile.) After the missile takes out an engine, both the 777's max speed and its max altitude are well within the Su-25 fighter's speed & altitude capabilities. Then, the Su-25 can show off its cannon power."

    Continue reading this article at Asia Times Online and if any sub-50 IQ bell end shows up to tell us we should not believe anything I read if it was not first published in US, UK, or European propaganda, remember all my sources have produced evidence for their opinions, so far the propaganda merchants have not produced a single shred of evidence in support of their loonytoons narrative.

    Unless like the leftie clowns you believe that "Our side are nicer people than them so you can believe us," is evidence.

    RELATED POSTS:

    Declaration of interdependence
    Democracy is dying
    Malaysia Flight 370: The Cover Up
    Malaysia Flight MH17 evidence
    The left's imagined monopoly on truth
    Liberal hate and hypocrisy
    How the extreme left moved to the authoritarian right
    Do lefties think they're immune to bigotry

  • The West not bombing Iraq for humanitarian reasons

    tornado bulk grain carrier
    RAF Tornado, not an ideal bulk grain carrier (source: flickr.com)

    The involvement of Britain’s Royal Air Force in delivering humanitarian aid in Iraq t has triggered speculations that the UK, may join the US in launching targeted air strikes against the Islamic State (ISIS). The RAF Tornados deployed Tornado are two seat fighter planes capable of low level supersonic flight but not ideal for delivering large payloads of bagged rice or bottled water. They could possibly be useful for dropping medicines however.

    Though British military leaders were insistent that the aircraft would only be used in Iraq as part of humanitarian operations, the choice of Tornados, described by military aviation publications as described as “a two-seat, all-weather, day/night attack aircraft" for a humanitarian mission has led to speculation that Britain might quickly be dragged into an escalating regional conflict by a the United States government that shows every sign of being committed to triggering global war.

    It would be more logical to assume that David Cameron is showing totally unacceptable devotion to his bum-boy buddy Barack Hussein Obama at whose bidding the UK is now being dragged back into the unwinnable struggle to keep the very large oilfields around Irbil (aka Erbil) under western control. Oil from the Ibril fields supplies a significant amount of energy to Europe.

    Does that make a little more sense? When you step back and look at the bigger picture, it always comes back to oil.

    RELATED POSTS:
    Will new clean energy process make coal the fuel of the future
    Secrets And Lies And Oil In Scottish Referendum Cover Up
    Klondike 2: The Great Arctic Oil Rush
    We were bullied into buying diesel cars to help the environment. Now experts admit this ‘green’ fuel is killing thousands of us
    Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?
    Scalar wave enery: Forgotton science of free electricity
    Iceberg Alley Blues

  • Game And Set To Putin - Sanctions Hit EU Economies

    Do you remember how the lefties cheered just a short while ago when in retaliation for Russia not obliging the warmongers of the military / industrial complex by starting World War Three in response to numerous provocations.

    They praised Obamas's statesmanship when he threatened to crush the Russian economy and then cancelled the bus passes of superannuated Russian gangsters living in Florida. They went wild when Cameron and Osborne froze the bank accounts of Russian oligarchs domiciled in London, having first warned they would do this if Putin did not do as he was told. That of course gave the oligarchs plenty of time to move their money before the sanctions bit.

    They creamed their pants when the EU joined in by saying if Russia did not comply with instruction on Ukraine, the EU commissioners would be very annoyed.

    And they rilled on the floor laughing when The Kremlin said OK, you want to play with the big boys, here's some real economic warfare.

    And now we learn this:

    eu farmers hit by russian food embargo
    EU farmers say the Russian embargo on food trade is hitting them hard

    (via Russia Today)
    Austria is warning of catastrophic falling prices, and the Netherlands is saying losses could be triple initial estimates. A third of Lithuanian milk producers say they are facing problems.

    The wholesale price of a kilogram of fruit or vegetables could halve due to excess supply, the Austrian newspaper Salzburger Nachrichten cites Rupert Gsols, a federal coordinator of the Austrian Union of Market Gardeners.

    There is a bumper crop of European apples in 2014; around 12 million tons against the normal 10-11 million tons. About 370,000 tons are harvested in Poland.

    The economic damage to the Netherlands from the Russian boycott could be triple the original estimate and reach €1.5 billion, Dutch News cites Hans de Boer, the chief of VNO-NCW Dutch employers' organization.

    “That calculation did not take into account the Dutch dealers who operate from Eastern Europe,” de Boer said.

    In Lithuania, Russian countermeasures to Western sanctions are hitting milk producers the hardest, as about a third of firms face problems in finding alternative markets, RIA cites Jurate Dovydeniene, the head of the Lithuanian Association of Agricultural Cooperatives.

    Pieno Zvaigzdes, one of Lithuania’s five largest milk processing plants, suspended buying milk from farmers in the middle of month.

    Even those who didn’t supply the products to Russia will suffer, Andriejus Stancikas the head of the Agricultural Chamber of Lithuania said.

    “The situation became too dangerous especially for the agricultural sector, as the blockade is imposed not only on Lithuania, but to all the European Union. It would be difficult to reorient the deliveries to the West, these markets will be filled with their own production,” Stanchikas explained.

    Now it's almost inevitable that some stupid little tit will come along and tell you nothing that's published by Rusia Today can be believed. Ignore them, sucvh people are pathetic lefties who cannot tolerate anyone disagreeing with them, but aren't bright enough to get anything right. I don't speak German but do speak some Swedish and with that plus help from Google translate I can tell you the article is reasonable translation of the new story from the Austrian newspaper.

    RELATED POSTS:
    What Would The Future Look Like Without The Propaganda Happy Pills
    Germany Is Building a European Army Before Your Eyes
    American dollar dumped as world currency
    Iran dumps the pertodollar
    How Putin can win World War Three without firing a shot
    FUKUS axis imposes sanctions, Russian Oligarchs Shrug
    G77 Nations vow to destroy America’s New World Order
    The Debt Crisis from the beginning

  • Such Nice People Live On The Left Of The Political Spectrum

    Left wing politics, once the politics of freedom, individualism and self - determination has increasingly over the past few decades become the politics of hate, envy, bitterness, hypocrisy and authoritarianism. Left wing politics has now developed a level of intolerance for those who challenge its idiotic assumptions or moral superiority, it appears to be charging headlong towards fascism.

    Here's the latest example:

    from Breitbart London.

    Independent' Student Paper Tells UKIP MEP to 'F**k His Mother'

    the offending tweet to ukip's paul nuttall

    Britain's UK Independence Party (UKIP) has received abusive responses to a press release issued today. A student 'journalist' working at the self-described "independent national student newspaper" the Student Times, which has a circulation of around 150,000 every fortnight encouraged the UKIP official to engage in incest.

    Paul Nuttall, who is the deputy leader of UKIP stated in a press release: “Universities are more concerned about making money than ever before, and I am seriously concerned that by relaxing their entry requirements many students that would never have normally been offered a place will find it too difficult and there’ll be a lot dropping out over the next 12 months.”

    Instead of taking interest, as a responsible newspaper editor would, UKIP received the following reply from the news@studenttimes.org e-mail address:

    "You can tell Paul Nuttall to go and fuck his mother."

    One UKIP staffer replied, "Charmed", to which another reply came:

    "It must be really lonely working in Europe working for a bunch of fascist wankers. Now take us off your mailing list prick".

    Speaking to Breitbart London, Nuttall said of the incident: "I was astonished that the correspondent asked me to indulge in something not only unpalatable but also illegal.

    "I can't believe a reputable student magazine is apparently run by foul mouthed privileged left wing students who think that is an appropriate way to respond to a press release they do not agree with.

    "It speaks volumes about the state of education in this country and his or her grasp of the Queen's English. I can only hope that when the anonymous correspondent from the Student Times grows up, gets a job and has responsibilities they will look back and be thoroughly embarrassed by what they have done."

    read full post

    Still wondering why the Labour party is full of infantile, idiotic sheeple who bleat about equal rights for paedophiles, want to invite foreign murderers, rapists, people traffickers, pimps, muggers and extortionists as well as terrorists to come to Britain and carry on their odious careers safe in the knowledge that 'yooman rights' law will protect them from justice? Don't.....The morons who produce the kind of hate filled, extremist shit in this student rag will be the next generation of Labour MPs.

    So let's sum up: Things you are voting against if you vote Labour:

    Democracy, free speech, good manners, tolerance, respect, inteligence,

    Things you are voting for if you vote Labour:

    Equal rights for paedophiles, sharia law, more immigration, higher taxes, hate, more hate, still more hate.

    You know what to do.

  • Conspiracy Theorists Keep Good Company

    I find it rather tiresome to see that every time some writer or blogger observes that many major world events seem to be pointing towards the same inevitable conclusion, the establishment of a global government.

    People who have come to that conclusion are not right wing extremists as supporters of this Orwellian idea would have you believe. Much to the chagrin of the Oligarchic Collectivists pushing the globalist agenda, a recent study pronounced us right in the head (Conspiracy Theorists are sane) and wholly rational to keep asking the questions that Oligarchic Collectivists do not want members of the public asking.

    The idea of a global oligarchic government is not new of course. Take a look at this article. Don't take any notice of the blind people and those who simply refuse to see what's staring them in the fucking face, they will start jumping up and down screaming 'conspiracy theory'. Read the extract and observe the credit and date. The article is verifiable, copies of the original magazine exist in The British Library, The Library of Congress in the USA and all the libraries of record.

    It is not those accused of being 'conspiracy theorists' who deny reality, but those who join witch hunts, screaming "Cinspiracy theorists, burn them!"

    From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

    It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. – Winston Churchill, February 1920, in an article that appeared in the Illustrated Sunday Herald. You can read the full text, with the passage quoted to be found in the section headed International Jews by clicking THIS LINK The passage was also quoted in an article in The Guardian (2002)

    And it's not just Winston. While our wilfully blind chums are sticking their heads in the sand, putting fingers in ears and going LAA LAA LAA LAAA and generally behaving like the kind of sheeple who would believe back is white if the government told them it was so. the great and good, political and business leaders, academics, thinkers, have been using one of the 'conspiracy theorist' phrases, New World Order, in talking with varying degrees of enthusiasm or scepticism about the inevitability of a global totalitarian government for over a hundred years.

    As well as Chuchill, people such as John F Kennedy, Dwight Eisenhower, David Rockefeller, Francois Mitterand, Arthur Schlesinger, Dr. Henry Kissinger, Vannevar Bush (founder of Rayethon), Tony Blair (cue dies irae chanting), Winston Churchill, Dwight Eisenhower, H G Wells, Lyndon B. Johnson, Kofi Annan, (U.N. Secretary General) and plenty more have used the phrase. So it's hardly an invention of "right wing nut job bloggers" is it?

    And if you think all the people I mentioned are in the past, try this from the current Vice President of the USA:

    ""How I Learned to Love the New World Order"

    Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. published in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992) Posted here in this non-commercial blog under terms of fair use, for purposes of information, education and to improve understanding. It will of course be removed if the copyright holders ot isp request such.

    How I Learned to Love the New World Order

    Biden, Joseph R Jr.
    Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
    A13

    Abstract (Summary)
    Joseph R. Biden Jr defends his view that the Pentagon's new strategy which appoints the US as a sort of world monitor could render the US a hollow superpower. Biden explains why he reacted the way he did to the plan.

    ____________

    Counterpoint: How I Learned to Love the New World Order
    Biden, Joseph R Jr. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
    A13

    Imagine my surprise when a Wall Street Journal editorial appointed me dean of the Pat Buchanan school of neo-isolationism. My credentials? Believing that the Pentagon's new strategy -- America as "Globocop" -- could render the United States a hollow superpower. All agree we need the military capacity to defend our vital interests -- by ourselves when need be. The question is grand strategy. With the Journal's endorsement, the Pentagon has called for a Pax Americana: The U.S. should cast so large a military shadow that no rival dare emerge.

    American hegemony might be a pleasant idea, but is it economically, politically or even militarily wise? Bristling with weapons, we would continue our economic decline, while rising industrial and financial giants in Europe and Asia viewed our military pretensions with indifference or contempt.

    Defense Secretary Dick Cheney outdid even the Journal, dipping deep into the well of Cold War argumentation to accuse Pax Americana critics of thinking "America's world presence is somehow immoral and dangerous.
    " Why doesn't the Journal stop the namecalling, get its schools sorted out, and court an honest debate over America's proper role in the new world order?

    Pat Buchanan's "America First" preaches martyrdom: We've been suckered into fighting "other" people's battles and defending "other" people's interests. With our dismal economy, this siren song holds some appeal.

    But most Americans, myself included, reject 1930s-style isolationism. They expect to see the strong hand of American leadership in world affairs, and they know that economic retreat would yield nothing other than a lower standard of living. They understand further that many security threats -- the spread of high-tech weapons, environmental degradation, overpopulation, narcotics trafficking, migration -- require global solutions.

    What about America as globocop? First, our 21st-century strategy has to be a shade more clever than Mao's axiom that power comes from the barrel of a gun. Power also emanates from a solid bank balance, the ability to dominate and penetrate markets, and the economic leverage to wield diplomatic clout.

    Second, the plan is passive where it needs to be aggressive. The Journal endorses a global security system in which we destroy rogue-state threats as they arise. Fine, but let's prevent such problems early rather than curing them late. Having contained Soviet communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of "containment" -- based, like NATO, on collective action, but directed against weapons proliferation.

    The reality is that we can slow proliferation to a snail's pace if we stop irresponsible technology transfers. Fortunately, nearly all suppliers are finally showing restraint. The maverick is China, which persists in hawking sensitive weapons and technology to the likes of Syria, Iran, Libya, Algeria and Pakistan -- even while pledging otherwise.

    The Senate has tried to force China's leaders to choose between Third World arms sales (1991 profits of $500 million) and open trade with the U.S. (a $12.5 billion annual Chinese surplus). Even though we have convincing intelligence that China's leaders fear the use of this leverage, the president inexplicably refuses to challenge Beijing.

    Weapons containment can't be foolproof; and against a nuclear-armed North Korea, I would support pre-emptive military action if necessary. But let's do our best -- using supplier restraint and sanctions against outlaw sellers and buyers-to avoid having to round up the posse.
    Why not an anti-proliferation "czar" in the cabinet to give this objective the prominence it urgently needs?

    Third, Pax Americana is a direct slap at two of our closest allies -- Japan and Germany -- and a repudiation of one of our panel1. Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? great postwar triumphs. For years, American leaders argued that building democracy in Europe and Asia would guarantee stability because democracies don't start wars. Now the Pentagon says we must keep our military large enough to persuade Japan and Germany "not to aspire to a greater role even to protect their legitimate interests.
    "

    How has our success suddenly become a threat? It hasn't, but the Pentagon plan could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By insulting Tokyo and Berlin, and arrogating to ourselves military stewardship of the world, we may spark the revival no one wants.

    Secretary Cheney says he wants the allies to share the burden on defense matters. But Pax Americana puts us on the wrong end of a paradox: Hegemony means that even our allies can force ever greater U.S.
    defense spending the more they try to share the burden!

    Fourth, collective security doesn't rule out unilateral action. The Journal says I'm among those who want "Americans . . . to trust their security to a global committee." But no one advocates that we repeal the "inherent" right of self-defense enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.

    Secretary Cheney says his plan wouldn't undermine support for the U.N. Who would know better than the U.N.'s usually understated secretary general? If implemented, says Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the Pentagon's strategy would spell "the end of the U.N." Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? It envisages a permanent commitment of forces, for use by the Security Council. That means a presumption of collective action -- but with a U.S. veto.

    Rather than defending military extravagance, the Bush administration should be reallocating Pentagon funds to meet more urgent security needs: sustaining democracy in the former Soviet empire; supporting U.N. peacekeepers in Yugoslavia, Cambodia and El Salvador; and rebuilding a weakened and debt-burdened America.

    If Pentagon strategists and their kneejerk supporters could broaden their horizons, they would see how our superpower status is best assured. We must get lean militarily, revitalize American economic strength, and exercise a diplomatic leadership that puts new muscle into institutions of collective security.

    Sen. Biden is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's European Affairs Subcommittee.

    ---

    OK, now who are the conspiracy theorists?

  • The Return Of The Tupenny Upright?

    That erudite commentator on business and economics and Cappo di Tutti Cappi, Tony Soprano once said to one of his sidekicks, "In any recession which businesses are least affected? Prostitution, gambling and organised crime."

    Our political leaders, in Britain, Europe and the USA may be telling us the recession is over and recovery is surging ahead but this impression is largely created by increasing sovereign debt and fraudulent manipulation of statistics. In fact Boggart blog recently reported that politicians have been trying to claim prostitution, drug peddling and other illegal activities are driving economic growth.

    prostitutes boost gdp Entrepreneurs working to boost GDP (source)

    The Economist however has come up with a piece of evidence based on Sopranonomics which proves this recession .now a depression) is the longest and deepest ever. And prostitution is being hit hard.

    The Economist finds:

    "...the internet is making the buying and selling of sex easier and safer (from what we have been told). But it's not all Pretty Woman... not only is the oldest profession in the world seeing prices going down (the dreaded deflation) as the shift online has boosted supply by drawing more locals into the trade; but as the following four charts show, rates vary dramatically by 'services', ethnicity, geography, build, and bust size.

    Prices going down rather than heads. That's got to be bad news for working girls. The Economist even gave us a nice infographic showing that in an industry where earnings are based not only on range and quality of services offered, but on looks, legs, breast size, ethnicity, hair style and colour and dress sense (or lack of), earning are dropping faster while knickers are dropping less often.

    prostitution earnings
    (Source)

    Clearly then, deflation is hitting the working girls as well as their satisfied customers.

    Here's that link again, it's actually quite interesting reading and tells us a lot about the state of society.

    RELATED POSTS:
    Sleeping With Conservatives
    Could You Hug A Tory asks a feature in The Guardian some time ago. Several typical Guardian writers describe their feelings of fear and loathing when, purely in the interests of science of course, they hugged prominent members of the Conservative Party. Me? Sex is non political.
    Amsterdam's twin Prostitutes, The Fokkens Twins Retire At 70
    Lawyer speed dating
    Love for sale
    Practical Sex Education
    Sex Education Kerfuffle
    Sex On The Beach
    Sex Menu

  • ARSE!

    Things in the news have been a bit heavy for a few days, ISIS and the Yazidi in Iraq, worsening tensions in Ukraine (how can they still be getting worse), HAMAS and the Israelis going at it in Gaza, Ebloa going viral in west African and even on the celebrity blogs we have the sad news of Robin Williams premature demise. He leave us a catalogue of great films but a true comic genius can never be replaced.

    And then there's all the rest of it. The economy isn't improving because the recovery is just statistical trickery, in spite of the warmageddonists cries that three hot days showed they were right and we are all going to fry, summer seems to have come to an early end, we're still in the EU and the Liberal Democrats have not disbanded yet.

    Still, who has time to be serious? Watch this.
    <

  • Secrets And Oil In Scottish Referendum Cover Up

    massive oil find
    Massive oil find off Scottish coast hushed-up until after independence referendum? (source)

    Stumbled across this in a site titled Oil and Gas People dot com my peregrinations but the story seems to have cone viral around the Scottish diaspora since (not because) I mentioned it in Little Nicky Machiavelli. The Yes campaign, supporting a vote for full independence have latched onto it and are playing it for all it's worth.(hence picture from Yes (Highlands) web site. Could the story be a game changer I wonder?

    Speculation has been growing in the Oil Industry, the political circus and public bar debating chambers that there was more to the Prime Ministers recent secret visit to Shetland than has been released.

    The Facebook page of YES Highlands and Islands has released an article that unfortunately we cannot link to but which was shared by thousands and entered the blogosphere through cut and paste. It reported:

    David Cameron came to visit Shetland under the tightest secrecy ever seen in Shetland last week and the national press knew nothing about it. Nor the local press.

    Mr Cameron came to Shetland to say absolutely nothing about anything and allowed the local media 6 minutes of questions – Which he did not answer.

    Why the PM made a very rushed, and hugely expensive trip to the Shetland Oils, missing his cabinet meeting, and just making it back to Glasgow for the Games? The speculation in the industry is that there has been a huge oil find and this is not to be made public until after the Scottish independence vote next month.

    Is there any substance in this rumour? We don't actually know, but like Flight MH17 false flag story, the Syria gas attack story, the revelations that the US / EU sponsored rebellion in Syria would spill over into a wider conflict, the prediction that Ukraine's coup d'etat would turn out to be another CIA regime change scandal and so much much more, the blogosphere has a mightily impressive record on getting things right, while tile aft er time the official propaganda so eagerly passed on by tax eaters and sucked up by authority worshippers has turned out to be a great big steaming pile of bullshit.

    Is there more detail on this? Not yet, if there was it wouldn't be secret. I did manage to find this however:

    oil-secret,
    Sorry, its a bad screen capture Twitter did not like my software's 'capture region' feature

    Here's a link to that Twitter account

    And a good place to start your own research

    RELATED POSTS:
    Huge North Sea oil find enough to produce for over thirty five years. Media silence

  • Flight MH17 Shot Down By Air To Air Missile: New Straits Times

    New Straits Times is the newspaper of record in Malaysia. It is not government owned but has close toes to the Malaysian Government.

    from New Straits Times,

    US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft
    By Haris Hussain - 7 August 2014 @ 8:20 AM

    KUALA LUMPUR: INTELLIGENCE analysts in the United States had already concluded that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with it.

    This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air missile and finished off with cannon fire from a fighter that had been shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.

    In a damning report dated Aug 3, headlined “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts”, Associated Press reporter Robert Parry said “some US intelligence sources had concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame”.

    This new revelation was posted on GlobalResearch, an independent research and media organisation.

    Continue reading the report which after detailing the Kiev's denials goes on to reveal information even more damning for the Ukraine and United states military and intelligence agencies. The Malaysians have even gone so far as to suggest the USA deliberately withheld important information because it would have undermined their attempts to blame Russia. Mainstream media in the west has of course not printed or broadcast a word on this sensational story.

    mh17 wreckage
    A fragment of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 flight MH17, showing damage consistent with 30mm calibre machine gun fire (source New Straits Timeswhen I first suggested, shortly after the disaster and in the hours after President Obama had claimed to possess 'compelling evidence' that anti - Kiev rebels in Ukraine were responsible, that we should reserve judgement as it was too soon for any real evidence to have been gathered, I was jumped on by someone who accused me of being a gullible, right wing extremist conspiracy theorist for taking the reasonable line (read the comment thread). Thanks to Michael St Mark for joining in the fun by pointing out that while the Russians had produced their evidence pointing (inconclusively) to Kiev, the USA had produced nothing.

    You may remember than when challenged by American reporters on the evidence Obama had claimed, a US State Department representative referred the press conference attendees to 'social media'.

    actually the timeline of events immediately after the disaster followed the pattern laid down in the CIA playbook. Straight away after a major disaster, the US government blames an organisation it wants to discredit. This grabs headlines around the world and makes an impression on minds. Much later when the full details emerge the case is far less clear cut but of course the propaganda game is over by then. The problem is the USA has pulled this stunt so many times nobody believes them any more, except for a few half wit bloggers who never stop to think before hitting they keyboard to announce that they have special insight and do not need to wait for evidence.

    There is still no absolute detailed proof of what happened and probably never will be. There is however enough evidence to establish what did not happen.

    I'd like to think my critic is a big enough man to come by now and admit he was wrong and I was right (but certainly not right wing - I'm not the authoritarian idiot that tries to shout down people who hold different opinions) and that in future he will respect my superior intelligence.

    I will not be holding my breath however.

    UPDATE:
    The first comment in the thread, from Mark, a visitor, cites some claims made by the American government about alleged admissions of responsibility. Don't be misled by this blatant attempt to undermine my post, the claim made by a rogue rebel leader in east Ukraine who thought a Ukrainian military aircraft had been shot down and was trying to make a name for himself was quickly proved to be false. All the points so far made by people determined to support the lies of the warmongering American President and his lackey have been comprehensively dealt with and for ease of reference are tagged mh17. So from that you may assume Mark is too dim witted or too arrogant to do a bit of research, the answers are all there, he just refuses to believe them because they don't fit his prejudices.

    RELATED POSTS:
    Funny Things Happen In Ukraine - The Destriction Of The Convoy That Didn't Exist
    Another Obama Sponsored Genocide - not Alawi or Christians In Syria but Yazidi in Iraq.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.